January 6th insurrection thread...

nsacpi said:
An audit in principle is fine and is actually standard practice in most jurisdictions. There are two issues that make this one objectionable. First, the dude who owns the firm that is conducting it sent out these nut job memos to fellow nut job Sidney Powell about election fraud. That should automatically disqualify him and his company from being involved in something like that. The second objection is why Maricopa County and only Maricopa County. Smells fishy if you ask me. They got off to a brilliant start by equipping their workers with blue ink sharpies, which apparently is a big no no. Fortunately, someone pointed that out to them and now they have red and green ink sharpies.
Click to expand...

The audit report will speak for itself and it can be peer reviewed by any certified audit firm.

Wasn’t there a big to do about people complaining red sharpies were given out on election night and it was said they would still be read by the machine?

There is absolutely no reason to block these audits. Well except for one obvious reason. Keep averting your gaze however.
 
thethe said:
The audit report will speak for itself and it can be peer reviewed by any certified audit firm.

Wasn’t there a big to do about people complaining red sharpies were given out on election night and it was said they would still be read by the machine?

There is absolutely no reason to block these audits. Well except for one obvious reason. Keep averting your gaze however.
Click to expand...

Maricopa has already done an audit. But there is nothing wrong with a reputable outside firm doing one too. Emphasis on reputable. They should do one of all the counties of Arizona. Otherwise it looks like a fishing expedition.
 
nsacpi said:
Maricopa has already done an audit. But there is nothing wrong with a reputable outside firm doing one too. Emphasis on reputable. They should do one of all the counties of Arizona. Otherwise it looks like a fishing expedition.
Click to expand...

There is a basic concept in auditing called materiality. That’s your answer as to why only maricopa county is being audited.

But don’t worry. If the findings are what I think they will be there will be many more audits across the nation.

You can also not like an audit firm because of their politics but auditing is a science and their procedures will be drawn out and their work can be reviewed. So really the only reason to complain about who is auditing is because you’re afraid of what the results will be.
 
Also, the work performed is not technically an audit. It was an AUP from what I’ve read.
 
And the procedures performed were strictly on the DVS machines.

An audit to determine the legality of votes has yet to be performed.
 
[tw]1387414943402692612[/tw]

Btw I want to give a shoutout to Judge McFadden and other judges appointed by very poorly chosen one who have handled these cases and the "election fraud" cases that appeared before them with integrity and professionalism.
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
[tw]1387414943402692612[/tw]

Btw I want to give a shoutout to Judge McFadden and other judges appointed by very poorly chosen one who have handled these cases and the "election fraud" cases that appeared before them with integrity and professionalism.
Click to expand...

I think its only one side that believed they wouldn't .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
Brendan Hunt, an enthusiastic Trump supporter who called for killing members of Congress days after the Jan. 6 insurrection, was found guilty Wednesday of making a death threat against elected officials.

It took the jury in his case about three hours to reach a verdict, finding that comments Hunt made in a disturbing video posted online two days after the U.S. Capitol riot amounted to a genuine threat to murder elected officials in Washington.

He faces up to 10 years in prison.

The jury also concluded that menacing social media posts Hunt made in 2020 — including one directed at Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), then the Senate minority leader, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) — did not rise to the level of criminality.

Hunt, 37, was charged with one count of making a threat to assault and murder a United States official. He was arrested Jan. 19, a day before President Biden’s inauguration, after the FBI received a tip about his video, titled “KILL YOUR SENATORS: Slaughter them all.” The clip had been posted on BitChute, a hosting site popular with far-right conservatives, after the deadly riot in Washington.

Hunt’s prosecution in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn has been seen as a test of how far violent speech can go before it crosses a line into criminality. His lawyers argued that his comments, made from his Queens home, were constitutionally protected and that, while offensive, they were not legitimate threats.

Hunt’s prosecution in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn has been seen as a test of how far violent speech can go before it crosses a line into criminality. His lawyers argued that his comments, made from his Queens home, were constitutionally protected and that, while offensive, they were not legitimate threats.

Hunt also said he was heavily using marijuana and alcohol while struggling with depression and boredom during the coronavirus pandemic. He told the jury that the video he posted online after the Capitol riot was filmed while he was under the influence.

U.S. District Court Judge Pamela Chen had instructed jurors that while “intoxication in itself is not a legal defense to a criminal charge,” evidence of inhibition by drugs or alcohol can be considered to determine “whether he had intent.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...239624-a838-11eb-bca5-048b2759a489_story.html

an odd case...i'm actually not sure his saying these things should be a crime...a lot of stupid stuff gets said and shouldn't be criminalized
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
A few hacks.
Click to expand...

8a8.gif
 
Last edited:
Now we know that capitol police had credible information that there were going to be agitators who wanted to kill police in the 6th and get they did nothing. Trump is on record as suggesting that they needed 10k presence to keep the peace.

So who refused this information and didn’t act on it?

This will lead into eventually that it was purposefully allowed to happen.

This is yet another narrative that will absolutely flip 180 degrees from the original.
 
wait, hold up, Trump told them they needed 10k to keep the peace? Care to link me to that. I imagine this is another claim of his he makes after the fact to try and rewrite history to make himself look better. Its so hilariously transparent when he does it too.
 
cajunrevenge said:
wait, hold up, Trump told them they needed 10k to keep the peace? Care to link me to that. I imagine this is another claim of his he makes after the fact to try and rewrite history to make himself look better. Its so hilariously transparent when he does it too.
Click to expand...

he seemed to have had some sort of premonition that January 6 would be a rough day for the cops...the dude's a psychic

thethe is correct...very poorly chosen one had a conversation with the acting Secretary of Defense and expressed skepticism that their security plans would be enough

i don't think he meant for the Capitol to get overrun...he just wanted to make Mike Pence crap in his pants and refuse to accept the electoral votes of 6 states

Either way Liz Cheney is right to say that "There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution."
 
Last edited:
I recall a president putting people in internment camps due to their race. Or a president killing a citizen without charging them with a crime. Or mass illegal spying all citizens.

But sure... the unarmed trespassers is what ol Liz and team of useful idiots are most concerned about
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top