cajunrevenge
Well-known member
So your answer is to dodge and desperately try to change the subject. Thats what I thought.
Got REAL quiet in here. Durham had the exculpatory evidence all along. He had to know his case had no shot. Looks like he just wanted the headlines of an indictment. No chance this even makes it to trial much less a conviction. Where you are Charlie Brown.
![]()
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/...n-durham-is-relying-on-contradictory-evidence
Durham's case falling apart already. Really making me wonder if theres not some political bias in Durham's investigation. Charging Sussman on such weak evidence days before the statute of limitation ran out. I thought he was a professional guy. Looking more like a partisan hack now. Would love to know more about what the Durham investigation has been communicating.
Cajun is very impressed by the lack of charges the criminals are bringing against themselves