TLHLIM

sturg33 said:
Lol they must protect the real victim!

[Tw]1531755788062048257[/tw]
Click to expand...

Ah yes, one could never, ever determine the truth of the case if they see the word ‘their’ in front of the word penis. What a very good and important point. When you have a policy to use someone’s preferred pronouns, you simply use the ****ing policy. The BBC is still reporting on the rape and telling the victim’s story. Nobody read that story and failed to understand the case because they used a different ****ing pronoun.

What an absolutely ****ing pointless outrage.
 
That’s on brand for him mqt

He’s the other side of the coin. He’s the same as the people in the videos he shares, he’s just the other side of the spectrum
 
I'll ask I guess a 6th time... what justification do the leftists have for drag queen shows for children? since there is apparently no objection, what are the children gaining as a benefit from them?
 
mqt said:
Ah yes, one could never, ever determine the truth of the case if they see the word ‘their’ in front of the word penis. What a very good and important point. When you have a policy to use someone’s preferred pronouns, you simply use the ****ing policy. The BBC is still reporting on the rape and telling the victim’s story. Nobody read that story and failed to understand the case because they used a different ****ing pronoun.

What an absolutely ****ing pointless outrage.
Click to expand...


I don't think it's pointless outrage to complain about a supposed news source altering quotes to make them fit the transfascist policy they've decided on. This wasn't censored to where the words were unreadable, they changed the rape victim's description of her attacker.

This is exactly the slippery slope stuff a lot of people like to laugh off when we point out the danger of knowingly using false terms so we can all play along with the delusional fantasies of people who need mental health intervention.

The person who held this woman down and raped her with a penis was not a she or a they or a them or whatever ever other bull**** term would make their sorry rapist ass feel empowered, it was a he. That's the victim's truth or lived experience.
 
mqt said:
pointless outrage.
Click to expand...

tis a strong brand in America

would definitely go long if i could invest in financial asset linked to pointless outrage

but maybe i should not say this...it might upset some snowflakes and push them into voting for the Marjorie Taylor Greenes of our world
 
Jaw said:
I don't think it's pointless outrage to complain about a supposed news source altering quotes to make them fit the transfascist policy they've decided on. This wasn't censored to where the words were unreadable, they changed the rape victim's description of her attacker.

This is exactly the slippery slope stuff a lot of people like to laugh off when we point out the danger of knowingly using false terms so we can all play along with the delusional fantasies of people who need mental health intervention.

The person who held this woman down and raped her with a penis was not a she or a they or a them or whatever ever other bull**** term would make their sorry rapist ass feel empowered, it was a he. That's the victim's truth or lived experience.
Click to expand...

The fact that a news outlet would go to such lengths to protect the sensitive delusions of a rapist is insane.

And as per usual, the delusional seals on this board go to bat for the rapist
 
FULcLEZXsAUEdRv
 
I support nsacpi's right to celebrate Pride month. This is an empowering time for some members of our population, and if posting pictures of 5.56 rounds that look like children's lipstick makes him feel more fulfilled then I encourage it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top