First Former President to Have Home Raided by FBI

Traditionally there always has been:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-classified-records/

You might well be right, but let me ask this. Do you think it would be a positive thing for declassification to work in the way Trump supposedly did? Wouldn’t you want some sort of check on that power?

The courts let Bill Clinton walk for doing the same thing Trump did and established that the president can determine what are personal records or what is to be archived. Clinton followed no formal process either. As I said I'm good if we change the law.
 
Traditionally there always has been:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-classified-records/

You might well be right, but let me ask this. Do you think it would be a positive thing for declassification to work in the way Trump supposedly did? Wouldn’t you want some sort of check on that power?

If a check exists it should be another branch and not an unelected bureaucrat. As it stands POTUS has the unilaterial right to declassify anything. The administrative state is mad that he declassifieds all the information on their crimes.

Your outrage should be with them and not POTUS.
 
If a check exists it should be another branch and not an unelected bureaucrat. As it stands POTUS has the unilaterial right to declassify anything. The administrative state is mad that he declassifieds all the information on their crimes.

Your outrage should be with them and not POTUS.

I beg your pardon?
 
It bears noting that in their filings on his behalf none of very poorly chosen one's lawyers have claimed he declassified any of the documents.

It also bears noting that there are serious consequences for a lawyer to knowingly include falsehoods in a filing.
 
It bears noting that in their filings on his behalf none of very poorly chosen one's lawyers have claimed he declassified any of the documents.

It also bears noting that there are serious consequences for a lawyer to knowingly include falsehoods in a filing.

January 19th, 2021
 
It bears noting that in their filings on his behalf none of very poorly chosen one's lawyers have claimed he declassified any of the documents.

It also bears noting that there are serious consequences for a lawyer to knowingly include falsehoods in a filing.

No big deal. He does have witnesses that back up they were declassified in their presence.
 
[tw]1566824823208255488[/tw]

LOL - DOJ just pretending it doesn't have to follow the law.
 
The raid was about two things and eventually the seals will understand:

1 - On 01/19/21 Trump declassified all documents related to crossfire hurricane. For the young ones in the back, 'crossfire hurricane' was the illegal spying operating the Obama regime initiated on Trump prior to the 2016 election and the holdovers continued years into the Trump presidency. This was their nullification project to limit the impact a Trump presidency would have in changing the hearts and minds of the population (hello Hispanics and Black men). The DOJ/FBI is doing whatever it possibly can to limit their exposure and reduce their sentencing when the GOP (Better version of the GOP) takes power.

2 - Fishing expedition to try and get something else to rile up their fanatic's on 'Getting Trump'

What an embarrassment for the nation and we must look like idiots to the world.
 
Last edited:
A Special Master makes sense, and I’m fine with putting a pause on things until one is appointed and in place.
 
Also - I may be wrong about this but the claim from the DOJ is not that there are 'classified documents' but that there are documents with 'classified markers'.

Big distinction.
 
[tw]1566838632845033472[/tw]

Nice little footnote there.

There were no 'classified documents' at Mar-A-Lago.

I repeat:

THERE WERE NO CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS AT MAR-A-LAGO.
 
At a certain point I would think you leftists would be so tired of being wrong ALL THE TIME.
 
I'm guessing the clown BL will be banned from this thread too right Sturg?
 
Last edited:
A Special Master makes sense, and I’m fine with putting a pause on things until one is appointed and in place.

Special master for client-attorney privilege makes sense.

Claims of executive privilege will probably be adjudicated all the way to the Supreme Court. Whether a former dude can lay claim to executive privilege is one question. And whether he can lay claim to it against part of the executive branch (the DoJ) is another.
 
Back
Top