As everything else over time the idiot leftists will stop posting when they are shown to be hilariously wrong.
Probably one of his gay lovers that did it. So not politically motivated. But seriously though, he probably did it himself for attention.
Right are you starting to see why the initial reporting raised a lot of questions?
Paul called the police and described him as his friend.
The police initially said that a third person opened the door for them
They later qualified there was no third person
I'm not familiar with how they got in now. Did they barge in?
If so, how the heck was it originally claimed that they were let in?
If they were let in, and there was no third person, who the heck let them in? Am I supposed to believe Paul opened the door and then walked back to attacker to start getting assaulted?
Why do message board posters have to ask this rather than the media?
I understand your desire for snark. It's really how you can do these days
but please tell me why a person would call the cops on someone threatening him... and when the cops show up, return to the assailant who is holding a weapon in his hand
the best defense at this point would be senility
I don’t see how this even remotely works for you on any level. If this were a premeditated stunt, why would Pelosi go back to get his head bashed in with a hammer?
I do not believe pelosi planned to have his head bashed in, if you were confused about my position
As everything else over time the idiot leftists will stop posting when they are shown to be hilariously wrong.
The story has changed several times now and no body cam footage to be provided.
This is just going how every other big story has gone the last 8 years.
But not in any way that should cast doubt on what happened. They’re very minor corrections or clarifications that are being overanalyzed to death to fit your narrative.
But not in any way that should cast doubt on what happened. They’re very minor corrections or clarifications that are being overanalyzed to death to fit your narrative.
'minor' corrections can actually be a key to re-constructing what actually happened.
The thing about lies is that you have to consistently tell lies to keep up with changing facts or questions.
But when you're upfront and honest you never have to change the story.
Can we agree on these events?
1. Crazy lunatic somehow bypasses Pelosi security (or there was zero security) and breaks into Pelosi house
2. Crazy lunatic explains he wants to kill Nancy and threatens to tie up Paul until she returns
3. Paul convinces crazy lunatic to let him make a call or be excused to the bathroom (I'm not sure what the latest is here)
4. Crazy lunatic obliges
5. Cops come and knock on the door.
6. Crazy lunatic - holding a hammer - allows Paul to go answer the door during his crime/kidnap
7. Paul opens the door to great relief that the cops came to help him. Rather than tell the cops where the crazy guy is and stand behind them... He... Goes back to the crazy lunatic holding the hammer threatening to kill his wife
8. Crazy lunatic hammers his skull in
9. Cops tackle the crazy lunatic.
Can we agree on those events?