Looking forward to collecting

sturg33

sturg33

I
Are there any trump based charities out there? Will need to do some digging

Can always count on the lecturer being wrong about literally everything

nsacpi said:
but name your terms with respect to 2022...tell me o' sturg what you expect for 2022...and i'll be happy to bet against it
Click to expand...

sturg33 said:
The dems don't gain seats in both houses as you promised us.

$100 bucks to charity of our choice
Click to expand...


nsacpi said:
so i win if they gain in both houses

and you win otherwise?
Click to expand...


sturg33 said:
Thats correct
Click to expand...

nsacpi said:
done
Click to expand...
 
House is outside shot.

but barring something outrageous, they look to be gaining seats in the upper chamber.
 
I'll be happy to pay up any bet I lose. Unlike some (such as the dude who promised to leave these boards if presented with any scientific papers establishing the efficacy of masks is slowing the spread of covid) I pay up the bets I lose.
 
Put another way I wont be ginning up a conspiracy about burst water pipes, hacked voting machines and massive dumps to avoid paying.
 
Those things only happen to your sides benefit that’s why.

I’d love it if the left called for audits after they get blown out on the 8th. GOP will gain more seats after an audit.
 
There actually are audits done....you just keep insisting on a a level of audit that as far as I can tell haa never been done before.



As I have proven, Trump was against even doing recounts of Wisconsin and Michigan despite the fact that Hillary would have needed more than those 2 states to win the electoral college. There was literally no downside to the recounts for him. Using your logic that was proof he had something to hide. Yet you saw no one from "the left" here who thinks those recounts or an actual forensic audit would have changed the winner.
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
Put another way I wont be ginning up a conspiracy about burst water pipes, hacked voting machines and massive dumps to avoid paying.
Click to expand...


On the other hand there is a 100% chance little thethe will claim voter fraud if Republicans dont win the House and/or Senate. Heck, he will claim it if Reps dont get a 2/3rds majority on both .
 
cajunrevenge said:
There actually are audits done....you just keep insisting on a a level of audit that as far as I can tell haa never been done before.



As I have proven, Trump was against even doing recounts of Wisconsin and Michigan despite the fact that Hillary would have needed more than those 2 states to win the electoral college. There was literally no downside to the recounts for him. Using your logic that was proof he had something to hide. Yet you saw no one from "the left" here who thinks those recounts or an actual forensic audit would have changed the winner.
Click to expand...

Actually pretending whats done is an audit is another indication you have no clue what you're talking about.
 
So explain to the class what an audit actually is and show me where it's been done anywhere in a state wide election. What you are doing is making unreasonable demands then trying to imply that not being allowed to do it is proof of fraud. You can say you support it when Republicans win all you want, but we both know every single Republican who now demands audits will do a 180 when that happens.
 
cajunrevenge said:
So explain to the class what an audit actually is and show me where it's been done anywhere in a state wide election. What you are doing is making unreasonable demands then trying to imply that not being allowed to do it is proof of fraud. You can say you support it when Republicans win all you want, but we both know every single Republican who now demands audits will do a 180 when that happens.
Click to expand...

I'm demanding transparency of our voting process. You don't seem to care about that.

Recounts and logic tests are so far away from what an audit is supposed to be that its not even worth discussing.

Go find an auditor with experience and maybe they can knock some sense into you.
 
nsacpi said:
I'll be happy to pay up any bet I lose. Unlike some (such as the dude who promised to leave these boards if presented with any scientific papers establishing the efficacy of masks is slowing the spread of covid) I pay up the bets I lose.
Click to expand...

I dunno dude you tend to run away like a scared little bitch on subjects you get laughably wrong
 
I've been monitoring the projections for the House and the time has come for me to concede that sturg has won our bet. Congratulations. Name your charity and I will send them $100.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top