Lolita Express is finally arrested.

Yet you remove all context you dont like to try to defend Epsteins buddy Trump. You are all about prosecuting Epsteins buddies unless its Trump. Curious.

If trump is involved in sex trafficking with Epstein then I would send him to GITMO.

The fact that not a sniff of this has been raised tells me:

1. It never happened, or else they would gladly use to take it down

2. It did happen, but there would be so much collateral damage in exposing that they won't touch it
 
By the way, I'm not sure you're physically capable of responding to a critical post about someone without invoking Donald Trump
 
If trump is involved in sex trafficking with Epstein then I would send him to GITMO.

The fact that not a sniff of this has been raised tells me:

1. It never happened, or else they would gladly use to take it down

2. It did happen, but there would be so much collateral damage in exposing that they won't touch it


Ah, thats why, I guess only Democrats have access to evidence about Epsteins buddies. Republicans are just so principled they would never have used it to take down Bill Clinton when Hillary was running for President. I wonder what the party affiliation of the prosecutors who likely know the most about it is. No, I bet its the FBI that have the evidence..... which is made up overwhelmingly of Republicans.
 
I wont stop pointing out yours and other hypocrisy no matter how much you whine about it.

what is exactly is my hypocrisy about pointing out that Bill Gates is a scumbag who frequented the island of a sex trafficker and was apparently blackmailed by said sex trafficker
 
Ah, thats why, I guess only Democrats have access to evidence about Epsteins buddies. Republicans are just so principled they would never have used it to take down Bill Clinton when Hillary was running for President. I wonder what the party affiliation of the prosecutors who likely know the most about it is. No, I bet its the FBI that have the evidence..... which is made up overwhelmingly of Republicans.

I believe both parties are protecting everyone - which is why not a soul has faced any punishment.

And I believe if the Dems had evidence Trump was ****ing kids on Epstein's island... he'd be going to jail over that instead of some small bribe his lawyer made 10 years ago
 
what is exactly is my hypocrisy about pointing out that Bill Gates is a scumbag who frequented the island of a sex trafficker and was apparently blackmailed by said sex trafficker

Its not about Gates, I dont even know much about that, its almost literally everything else you post.
 
I believe both parties are protecting everyone - which is why not a soul has faced any punishment.

And I believe if the Dems had evidence Trump was ****ing kids on Epstein's island... he'd be going to jail over that instead of some small bribe his lawyer made 10 years ago


Cool, so you believe if there was evidence Bill Clinton was raping kids on Epsteins island Republicans would have exposed it to. Or do you think Republicans dont do things for political gain...... *cough* Devin Nunes.
 
Cool, so you believe if there was evidence Bill Clinton was raping kids on Epsteins island Republicans would have exposed it to. Or do you think Republicans dont do things for political gain...... *cough* Devin Nunes.

I do not believe Republicans would expose Bill Clinton in this scenario because I believe there are dozens of republicans just as guilty
 
I believe both parties are protecting everyone - which is why not a soul has faced any punishment.

And I believe if the Dems had evidence Trump was ****ing kids on Epstein's island... he'd be going to jail over that instead of some small bribe his lawyer made 10 years ago

The most suspicious part was how the Florida prosecutors handled the case. Google Acosta and Epstein. Yes the Acosta very poorly chosen one made Labor Secretary.
 
I do not believe Republicans would expose Bill Clinton in this scenario because I believe there are dozens of republicans just as guilty


But you think Democrats would burn other Democrats to "get Trump" despite him being so politically incompetent he has never even got within 3 million votes of his opponnent in a general election? Lets be real, Republicans would accept evidence Trump raped kids with Epstein anyways. They would call it a deep state plot to entrap Trump because they knew he would one day run for President.
 
I do not believe Republicans would expose Bill Clinton in this scenario because I believe there are dozens of republicans just as guilty

Exactly. What would be the point of getting Clinton on anything at this point. They are both ancient history
 
it is telling that you get more angry about no snacks in a voting line than you do about a notorious sex trafficker's clients facing zero accountability

you're so ****ing stupid lol

I said I wouldn't be shocked if someone was a pedo and asked for evidence if you have it and how everyone wants pedos to be help accountable

and you went with some gibberish and then some made up example you concocted and passed a long as fact


btw, my post and the use of obsessed wasn't being used in the way you tried to spin it but you do you man

keep being the brave patriot with the stance of being against pedos though. you only stand with like 99.99999% of the population on this one and 100% of the message board here.
 
If trump is involved in sex trafficking with Epstein then I would send him to GITMO.

The fact that not a sniff of this has been raised tells me:

1. It never happened, or else they would gladly use to take it down

2. It did happen, but there would be so much collateral damage in exposing that they won't touch it

What do you think of the evidence regarding Matt Gaetz engaging in the sex trafficking of minors?
 
I could be mistaken but wasn't it proven that the people he were dealing with adults?

Nope. Prosecutors declined to prosecute. They thought it would be too easy to impeach the credibility of their main witness (who has pled guilty to a long list of crimes). But surely you can make assessments in the court of public opinion. If sex trafficking of minors is as important to you as you claim.
 
Nope. Prosecutors declined to prosecute. They thought it would be too easy to impeach the credibility of their main witness (who has pled guilty to a long list of crimes). But surely you can make assessments in the court of public opinion. If sex trafficking of minors is as important to you as you claim.

Why did they decline to prosecute officially?

I believe if you went back to that thread you will find me comments about sending him away if he is guilty
 
Want to be sure I understand your position BL. You are comparing what allegedly happened with Epstein to what was reported on Gaetz?
 
Why did they decline to prosecute officially?

I believe if you went back to that thread you will find me comments about sending him away if he is guilty

They declined because they thought it would be difficult to win a case with that dude as the main witness.

So the way you view other situations possibly involving child grooming and sex trafficking also turns on getting a conviction?
 
Back
Top