Remember Obama Girl?

Yeah - well, she hates him now (crazy when someone is actually objective, right 57?)

Link

elow are some of her observations on all the "mayhem and crime" committed by the president:

You bailed out bankers and placed them in your cabinet.

You placed Monsanto in charge of your FDA

You helped out pharmaceutical and health insurance companies with Obamacare

You expanded Bush's wars and started new ones with drones branding yourself a humanitarian war monger

You bragged about crippling sanctions against Iran though they directly affected civilians

You extended the patriot act and asserted your right to spy on the American people

You asserted your right to detain them without trial

You seized the authority to assassinate Americans without providing any evidence of their guilt or offering them due process of law

You viciously punish journalists and pursue whistleblowers who expose your crimes though you vowed to protect them when you were running for office

You arm Al Qaeda insurgents and refused to close Guantanamo, and you along with congress have criminalized protest

And still you have the audacity to scold dictators about democracy, protests and freedom

Her conclusion:

Mr. Obama - you are the biggest fraud that has ever been perpetrated on the American people and it's been a long time since I bought into it so I think it's about time to burn your shirt.

 
He is in NYC rubbing elbows and throwing support to Sharpton today. Great way to polish off a week IMO. Not smart after seeing videos with Sharpton at coke deals surface this week.

Don't forget IRS targeting.
 
Mr. Obama - you are the biggest fraud that has ever been perpetrated on the American people and it's been a long time since I bought into it so I think it's about time to burn your shirt.

SAV, this was the word I was wanting to use (CON ARTIST + LIAR) = FRAUD. I don't like people like that and when someone capable of doing this that can harm you and your way of life, I will like you even less. At least this lady provided a partial list that disgusted me.
 

bender-doomed.jpg
 
I'm not personally a fan of everything Obama has done, but to think he's different or worse in pretty much any way than any other president is pretty silly. To think he's much worse, or to think someone like Ron Paul would do a much better job is a joke and fails to bring that "objectivity" to the table.
 
I'm not personally a fan of everything Obama has done, but to think he's different or worse in pretty much any way than any other president is pretty silly. To think he's much worse, or to think someone like Ron Paul would do a much better job is a joke and fails to bring that "objectivity" to the table.

Dude, objectivity migrated the hell away from this place a LONG time ago, did you not notice that previously???
 
No, I was speaking more to the fact that it doesn't matter who is the president. Our government is run by the wealthy.

And pretty much always has been. Such is life. But the gap in wealth continues to grow, and that's the real problem. But you don't want to do anything about that. So not sure where you're coming from.

Just because the people at the top figure out how to accumulate more money while screwing those below them doesn't mean we need to allow it. It's easy to keep and grow your money when you already have a **** ton. It's really, really hard when you start with very little.
 
I find it kind of hard not to scoff at the cop-out of 'Oh, our country is run by the rich and there's nothing we can do about it.' I mean, did anybody actually expect Obama, a truly prototypical politician, not to fall prey to 'the way'? I can honestly say that I believe RON Paul wouldn't have been such a puppet. Not to endorse him, per se, but there is still such a thing as an independent leader.
 
I find it kind of hard not to scoff at the cop-out of 'Oh, our country is run by the rich and there's nothing we can do about it.' I mean, did anybody actually expect Obama, a truly prototypical politician, not to fall prey to 'the way'? I can honestly say that I believe RON Paul wouldn't have been such a puppet. Not to endorse him, per se, but there is still such a thing as an independent leader.

I don't know how effective he would have been. He wouldn't have all that much control to change things. It takes a lot more than one person. He would have been standard, or close to it.
 
And pretty much always has been. Such is life. But the gap in wealth continues to grow, and that's the real problem. But you don't want to do anything about that. So not sure where you're coming from.

Just because the people at the top figure out how to accumulate more money while screwing those below them doesn't mean we need to allow it. It's easy to keep and grow your money when you already have a **** ton. It's really, really hard when you start with very little.

I don't agree with the Liberal mindset of creating a welfare nation though so I do believe there is a difference. The wealthy do well under both Liberal/Conservative ideologies. I feel the attention paid to the poor and willifully unemployed is unacceptable.
 
Back
Top