Super's latest activity

…players don’t have leverage in a free agent market? Again, complete and total nonsense. Your brain is a pretzel.

Sure, if that makes you feel better I guess. Can you answer the question I’ve asked a bunch of times?

What you’re saying is complete nonsense.

Could Murphy fetch a 40 prospect or not? Have you answered that question yet?

Twisting themselves into pretzels to somehow claim Murphy has negative trade value due to his 3/$45 contract. Wild.

what are you even talking about, the team can't negotiate with the player but they can negotiate with the player's current team which...

Yes, teams famously don’t need players during free agency.

This has positively nothing to do with his trade value. Your confusion is mounting.

When you said he had negative trade value, I assumed you were saying he had negative trade value. My bad. Not sure how I mixed that up.

So you just don’t know what the word “negative” means. Got it.

So they are simultaneously willing to pay him that contract but also unwilling because…reasons. Got it. Makes total sense. Of course...

Lol claiming off waivers is exactly the same as paying them that contract as a FA…the refusal to admit that saying Murphy has negative...

Wait what? If you claim a guy off waivers you are exactly taking on that contract. Why would someone do that and not be willing to give...

I am not in favor of trading players at their lowest value. I’m not sure who said he has great trade value but I guess it’s straw man...

And even still, if a team is willing to give up a prospect for him, guess what? That means he doesn’t have negative value.