Not sure the best place for this, but I have a genuine question:
For someone who is taken by Matt Walsh’s general argument here, what is the positive of this woman? I’m not actually unfriendly to many of the conservative arguments on free speech, but what I don’t understand is how to come away from watching a woman repeatedly use a slur to refer to a small child, and come away with anything but disdain. Should her entire life be ruined? No. Should people threaten her or abuse her in public? No. But what is the cause she was advancing that necessitates giving her thousands of dollars and how is this behavior any different than the idiots who donated to Karmelo Anthony’s family? If it’s not racism fueling this behavior, what is it? There are some very prominent right wing figures all-in on this, and I’m curious what positive reason there could be for it.