TRHLIM

sturg33 said:
What is the rational to avoid saying what happened?
Click to expand...
There doesn’t need to be one. The Mayor-Elect of New York City does not need to answer for his expression of sympathy toward a murder victim in Washington DC not being detailed enough. That a bunch of right-wing weirdos have decided he must doesn’t change the fact that his post was perfectly fine.
 
mqt said:
There doesn’t need to be one. The Mayor-Elect of New York City does not need to answer for his expression of sympathy toward a murder victim in Washington DC not being detailed enough. That a bunch of right-wing weirdos have decided he must doesn’t change the fact that his post was perfectly fine.
Click to expand...
I have a feeling if a right wing nazi assassinated AOC, and Trump tweeted his sympathy for the "sudden and unexpected passing of the congresswoman" you would take him to task for playing defense for the murderer
 
sturg33 said:
I have a feeling if a right wing nazi assassinated AOC, and Trump tweeted his sympathy for the "sudden and unexpected passing of the congresswoman" you would take him to task for playing defense for the murderer
Click to expand...
Or he could like you chuckle about the possibility of a gay love triangle gone bad.
 
sturg33 said:
I have a feeling if a right wing nazi assassinated AOC, and Trump tweeted his sympathy for the "sudden and unexpected passing of the congresswoman" you would take him to task for playing defense for the murderer
Click to expand...
No, I am honestly fine with people just expressing their condolences on social media. Not every single piece of digital communication needs to be a succinct, world-changing insight. Though at least in your context the person involved in the outrage has any business having his opinion sought after. Did you go check to see if the mayor of Butte, Montana had a strong enough tweet for this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top