2026 MLB Draft Thread

CJ9

Well-known member
I'll get this started now that we know we're picking 9th in the first round, as well as the Baldwin comp pick being 26th. If the Braves sign a free agent who rejected the qualifying offer, a lot of this will be blown up but I don't think that'll happen. I know everybody is bummed about the way the lottery went and I'm right there with you, but there's still a lot to be excited about with this. We will have all of our 20 draft picks, plus the additional Baldwin pick.

Last year, the Reds picked 9th in the draft. They had zero PPI or competitive balance picks (they had one but traded it to LA in the Lux deal), so this should be pretty easy math here. Their bonus pool was worth $11,836,800. If you add the 26th pick value ($3,492,200) to that, that would mean our bonus pool would've been $15,329,000, which would've been the sixth highest pool amount in last year's draft. Keep in mind pick values increase every year and the 2026 values haven't been released yet, so we'd just bey guessing at what the specific numbers will be based on last year's, but it seems fair to expect us to have around the 5-7th biggest pool in this year's draft. Last year, our entire bonus pool was $9,081,100 - the 9th pick in 2025 alone had a value $6.5 million on its own last year.

We will have the advantage of being the team with the earliest second pick in the draft. So if any of the expensive high school talent starts falling down the board, we'll be the first team to make its second pick and have a shot to give them a big deal. I do think that's pretty significant and a big reason why our PPI pick being ahead of Houston's actually does matter.

There are a lot of smaller details that could change things based on who signs which free agents. We know the Diamondbacks will get a pick after the first round when Zac Gallen signs somewhere, but that's the team QO free agent who will net a pick that high.

The good news is that the 2026 draft has been graded out really well by draft writers. We'll use Pipeline since it's free, but you can see their top 100 draft prospects rankings and their first mock draft, which doesn't include our second pick for some reason.

Still a lot to look forward to with this draft even with the bad luck in the lottery.
 
I'll get this started now that we know we're picking 9th in the first round, as well as the Baldwin comp pick being 26th. If the Braves sign a free agent who rejected the qualifying offer, a lot of this will be blown up but I don't think that'll happen. I know everybody is bummed about the way the lottery went and I'm right there with you, but there's still a lot to be excited about with this. We will have all of our 20 draft picks, plus the additional Baldwin pick.

Last year, the Reds picked 9th in the draft. They had zero PPI or competitive balance picks (they had one but traded it to LA in the Lux deal), so this should be pretty easy math here. Their bonus pool was worth $11,836,800. If you add the 26th pick value ($3,492,200) to that, that would mean our bonus pool would've been $15,329,000, which would've been the sixth highest pool amount in last year's draft. Keep in mind pick values increase every year and the 2026 values haven't been released yet, so we'd just bey guessing at what the specific numbers will be based on last year's, but it seems fair to expect us to have around the 5-7th biggest pool in this year's draft. Last year, our entire bonus pool was $9,081,100 - the 9th pick in 2025 alone had a value $6.5 million on its own last year.

We will have the advantage of being the team with the earliest second pick in the draft. So if any of the expensive high school talent starts falling down the board, we'll be the first team to make its second pick and have a shot to give them a big deal. I do think that's pretty significant and a big reason why our PPI pick being ahead of Houston's actually does matter.

There are a lot of smaller details that could change things based on who signs which free agents. We know the Diamondbacks will get a pick after the first round when Zac Gallen signs somewhere, but that's the team QO free agent who will net a pick that high.

The good news is that the 2026 draft has been graded out really well by draft writers. We'll use Pipeline since it's free, but you can see their top 100 draft prospects rankings and their first mock draft, which doesn't include our second pick for some reason.

Still a lot to look forward to with this draft even with the bad luck in the lottery.
That and there will be guys moving up draft boards that we haven't heard of yet that will push some of the better guys down to us.
 
There will be tons of guys names thrown around between now and the draft especially with some guys coming out of nowhere. Hopefully one of the top guys fall a few spots and we snatch them up.
 
There will be tons of guys names thrown around between now and the draft especially with some guys coming out of nowhere. Hopefully one of the top guys fall a few spots and we snatch them up.
For sure. Worth remembering at this point last year, Jace Laviolette was the slam dunk #1 pick. And he had a rough spring and fell to late in the first round. Things are going to change a ton.
 
There will be a ton of good SS early. If none of the SS we drafted this year are showing anything around the draft a College SS would be a good pick.
 
I would like to see a focus on position players who make good contact. I don’t particularly care about their other skills or their position. Projected power? Athleticism? Great glove? All are worthless if they can’t put a good lick on the ball. You would think that a system that has been short on hitters for a while now would make that a focus from time to time.

I understand the philosophy of not drafting for positional need. The flameout rate for individual prospects is too high and the timeframe is too long. But the Braves have an organizational need at this point for hitters.
 
I completely agree. It's time to add a few high-ceiling hitters with strong contact profiles. In the end, that is probably the best way to inject talent and depth into the system in one swoop.

It would have been much better if they had landed a top-five pick, but the team still has a legitimate chance to improve a farm system that currently ranks around 25th to somewhere closer to 15th, which would be a significant jump.
 
I would like to see a focus on position players who make good contact. I don’t particularly care about their other skills or their position. Projected power? Athleticism? Great glove? All are worthless if they can’t put a good lick on the ball. You would think that a system that has been short on hitters for a while now would make that a focus from time to time.

I understand the philosophy of not drafting for positional need. The flameout rate for individual prospects is too high and the timeframe is too long. But the Braves have an organizational need at this point for hitters.

You dont draft for need but there are 3 main positions teams focus on. CF, SS, and catcher. 60% of those SS and CF will move to another position. Its just a really bad sign when a 17 year old is already not athletic enough to play CF or SS.


One thing I ask when it comes to position prospects is not to take ones whose best skills are arm strength and running speed. Thats great if we are competing in triathlons but not so great for hitting the ball.
 
My early favorites for our early picks

#9- Either HS LHP Bolemon or Rojas. Love them both.

#26- College SS Tyler Bell is ranked 22nd. I like him. Could jump Southsiene on the depth chart and give us good depth at a big position of need. Otherwise plenty of HS OF to choose from.


#50- Jose Contreras son Joseph is a RHP ranked 47th. Good arm action with the genes of a Dad who was unusually durable. Sign me up.
 
I d
You dont draft for need but there are 3 main positions teams focus on. CF, SS, and catcher. 60% of those SS and CF will move to another position. Its just a really bad sign when a 17 year old is already not athletic enough to play CF or SS.


One thing I ask when it comes to position prospects is not to take ones whose best skills are arm strength and running speed. Thats great if we are competing in triathlons but not so great for hitting the ball.
I don't necessarily think it's a "bad sign" that a draftee isn't projected at a premium defensive position in the majors.
 
Thats not what I said. If they arent playing a defensive premium position in high school its a red flag. The bat needs to be really special to be drafted high as a HS 1B.
 
Back
Top