TLHLIM

mqt said:
It’s pretty simple for me. This doctor clearly understands the question being asked and the scientific answers to it. She has no confusion over the differences between males and females, nor does Hawley, so science is off the table here entirely. Instead, the question Hawley is asking here is pertaining to language. If you want to get into another argument about words, be my guest. But don’t pretend it’s anti-science for a doctor to quibble a bit on language.

That said, I’d just say no, men cannot get pregnant.
Click to expand...
Holy shit
 
Any day now the left is going to come out and slam state politicians for aiding and assisting the robbing of our treasuries right?

Any day now…..
 
mqt said:
It’s pretty simple for me. This doctor clearly understands the question being asked and the scientific answers to it. She has no confusion over the differences between males and females, nor does Hawley, so science is off the table here entirely. Instead, the question Hawley is asking here is pertaining to language. If you want to get into another argument about words, be my guest. But don’t pretend it’s anti-science for a doctor to quibble a bit on language.

That said, I’d just say no, men cannot get pregnant.
Click to expand...
Dude. Shes an expert witness on a medical hearing, and refuses to state biological reality bc she is a slave to a woke religion.

Leftists have brought us to a point where a doctor will not say a basic truth out of fear of undermining the delusions of a bunch of crazy people who have been elevated to society's most protected class.

And you're like "I dont see the big deal we are talking about words"
 
sturg33 said:
Dude. Shes an expert witness on a medical hearing, and refuses to state biological reality bc she is a slave to a woke religion.

Leftists have brought us to a point where a doctor will not say a basic truth out of fear of undermining the delusions of a bunch of crazy people who have been elevated to society's most protected class.

And you're like "I dont see the big deal we are talking about words"
Click to expand...
You can consider the words part as big of a deal as you want, but nothing she was saying here suggests she’s not a credible medical/scientific expert. There’s no confusion over which subset of the population can get pregnant and there’s no biological reality being rejected by her response. I understand what your point is in terms of the larger debate, but this exchange is pretty directly a question of how we use certain words in a social conversation rather than an expert not knowing the biology.
 
sturg33 said:
Dude. Shes an expert witness on a medical hearing, and refuses to state biological reality bc she is a slave to a woke religion.

Leftists have brought us to a point where a doctor will not say a basic truth out of fear of undermining the delusions of a bunch of crazy people who have been elevated to society's most protected class.

And you're like "I dont see the big deal we are talking about words"
Click to expand...
When you are embarrassed by the answer you avoid at all costs. Pretty yellow behavior. Shows a lack of principals.

Like dealing with my toddlers way back then.
 
https://twitter.com/x/status/2012266673588273506

The robots are still cool, dudes. If your options are doctor or no doctor and there’s no doctor, you’re fucked. While it should not replace proper care wherever possible, these kinds of innovations are a good thing. We can’t ignore the importance of innovating and improving care within the real world we live in. The left should be pushing for both these types of innovations *and* whatever their healthcare aims are. Even if you went full socialized healthcare, you still need to reduce the fucking costs. If simple, healthy pregnancies can be less expensive by using a robot to do routine procedures, why would we be against that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top