Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

It’s not a good side to be on

Trump has done a few things well but making Dems defend the worst positions is his true talent
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
Tapate50 said:
DNC having trouble fundraising also

Major donors dropped from 130 to 47

But I agree with this premise

One side is for norms, one side is bat shit
Click to expand...
When you took away USAID they all of a sudden have no money.

Who would have thunk it?
 
thethe said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/2022017771635183782

most Libertarian president ever?
Click to expand...
I would bet a trillion dollars there's no way this repeal saves everyday americans a trillion dollars. It may save big corps billions but not average americans. Like the retarded part that about making cars cheaper. I'm assuming that's based off the Heritage foundation study. Which basically assumed that because of the lowering cost of other things that cars would lower in price too. Sure this likely will make some trucks cheaper, but the average car there's no reason it costs more.

Also finally, it's retarded not to include tax incentives for buying American made hybrids and EVs. I know it's not popular amount the retarded base, but it's legit retarded not to do.
 
zitothebrave said:
I would bet a trillion dollars there's no way this repeal saves everyday americans a trillion dollars. It may save big corps billions but not average americans. Like the retarded part that about making cars cheaper. I'm assuming that's based off the Heritage foundation study. Which basically assumed that because of the lowering cost of other things that cars would lower in price too. Sure this likely will make some trucks cheaper, but the average car there's no reason it costs more.

Also finally, it's retarded not to include tax incentives for buying American made hybrids and EVs. I know it's not popular amount the retarded base, but it's legit retarded not to do.
Click to expand...
I wonder if slashing burdensome regulation to satisfy climate models that were intentionally wrong will help businesses run more efficiently and cut costs.

Hmmmmm
 
thethe said:
I wonder if slashing burdensome regulation to satisfy climate models that were intentionally wrong will help businesses run more efficiently and cut costs.

Hmmmmm
Click to expand...
Saving businesses money =/= saving Americans money.

The assumption this person is making is predicated on businesses passing on 100% of their savings to consumers which never has and never will happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top