Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

sturg33 said:
If we didnt need to protect the individual in this corporate environment, maybe we could change our voting habbits

But priorities are priorities
Click to expand...
Funny thing is if we eliminated mail in ballots across the country someone like Vance/rubio/rds would win in a 40 state landslide.
 
sturg33 said:
But even the leftists on this board say this fraud is just something we have to accept bc the alternative is being mean on twitter
Click to expand...
Once the governemnt properly represents the will of the people and not who can commit the most fraud chasing ballots the actual voter never knows are being cast things will drastically shift in this nation.

Talking about consistent 40-50 seat majorities in house and 5-8 in Senate.
 
The Tariff King said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/2033897242986209689

Is he telling the truth or did Tucker pay him to say this.
Click to expand...

This isn't meaningful for the gov but might be quite interesting involving the electorate.

It wouldn't surprise me if this was the base opinion of the disaffected libertarian type that Trump won the hearts of and they all felt betrayed enough to drop off voting wise.

And I'll note, I strongly dislike this guy to boot as well.
 
The Tariff King said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/2033897242986209689

Is he telling the truth or did Tucker pay him to say this.
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t rule the latter out regardless, but it’s painfully obvious to anybody with a working brain that Iran wasn’t on the verge of attacking us, both on its face and based on the post-strike justification tour. They had the cult almost immediately talking about the impact to China as if that would negate the fact that they couldn’t speak to any actual threat to American safety.
 
mqt said:
I wouldn’t rule the latter out regardless, but it’s painfully obvious to anybody with a working brain that Iran wasn’t on the verge of attacking us, both on its face and based on the post-strike justification tour. They had the cult almost immediately talking about the impact to China as if that would negate the fact that they couldn’t speak to any actual threat to American safety.
Click to expand...

For sure - Iran has not posed a threat to America ever. Like who would have possibly thought that. They have no aspirations to commit mass death.

Just innocent people .

Team Iran!
 
Iran did not pose an imminent direct threat to the United States. But it is a malign actor that has destabilized a region that is strategically important to us.
 
nsacpi said:
Iran did not pose an imminent direct threat to the United States. But it is a malign actor that has destabilized a region that is strategically important to us.
Click to expand...

We have no way of determining what 'imminent threat' means.

If it means that they reached a point where their surrounding defenses would be such we could not deter nuclear proliferation then I could understand the determination.

Joe Kent who by all accounts seems like a good person had a very different opinion on Iran not too long ago. Its all very suspicious whats happening on the right now - specially with blaming the Joos for everything.
 
sturg33 said:
Nothing makes me laugh more when leftists complain about wasteful spending. What about the steaks for the troops?!!

https://twitter.com/x/status/2034119952060321864
Click to expand...
*Slight* difference here between steaks for the troops and spending billions of dollars to blow up another country. And I still find myself confused by the argument that you must be a tight fiscal hawk to care about lighting billions of dollars on fire to wage a war that is also making life more expensive for Americans, or that not properly fighting against negative externalities of a program to feed or provide medical care to those in need means you lose the right to complain about us wasting it on a war.
 
sturg33 said:
If we didnt need to protect the individual in this corporate environment, maybe we could change our voting habbits

But priorities are priorities
Click to expand...
I needn’t vote for the other people who refuse to fix anything but have policies I dislike, should I?
 
mqt said:
*Slight* difference here between steaks for the troops and spending billions of dollars to blow up another country. And I still find myself confused by the argument that you must be a tight fiscal hawk to care about lighting billions of dollars on fire to wage a war that is also making life more expensive for Americans, or that not properly fighting against negative externalities of a program to feed or provide medical care to those in need means you lose the right to complain about us wasting it on a war.
Click to expand...
I would not have launched a war against Iran.

But wars actually do cost money... all the needless fraud you're cool with should be easily cut off. There is no purpose to it other than fraud
 
sturg33 said:
I would not have launched a war against Iran.

But wars actually do cost money... all the needless fraud you're cool with should be easily cut off. There is no purpose to it other than fraud
Click to expand...
I would not have allowed fraud to go unchecked.

But SNAP and Medicaid programs actually cost money… all the needless bombing should be easily cut off. There is no purpose to it other than bombing Iran.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top