Search results

  1. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Lots exist and have capacity to produce more. Thats why there were 10K more jobs created in Feb because they know whats about to happen.
  2. thethe

    Economics Thread

    The CCP enslaving their people. That wasn't centrally planned? The whole system is dependent on their central planning which you supposedly are against.
  3. thethe

    Economics Thread

    But trying to negatively impact the CCP? Thats an interesting twist. Meanwhile, you support a system that made the CCP the strongest communist state in world history.
  4. thethe

    Economics Thread

    which administration created conditions to facilitate cheap labor in China? They aren't centrally planned?
  5. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Declining dollar is great for American exports. Costs are decreasing simultaneously here.
  6. thethe

    Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

    He had several opportunities. But where are the experts saying he isn't a part of MS-13?
  7. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Strug hates central planning - Supports manufacturing in China. Can't make it up.
  8. thethe

    Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

    What police enforcement or gang experts have the left brought to the table to combat the 'right wing narrative'?
  9. thethe

    extraterrestrial life on K2-18b

    Think of the fuel costs!
  10. thethe

    Economics Thread

    No - I want more manufacturing to be int he US to increase exports while also domestically sourcing items. You don't think the move to manufacutring to China wasn't centrally planned? Thats cute....
  11. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Absolutely not - This is going to happen over time but I expect an increase in manufacutring jobs to happen throughout Trumps term. Can you tell me what happened in the February jobs report for manufacturing jobs?
  12. thethe

    Economics Thread

    No no no no - More exports. More access to foreign markets. We have free trade on the incoming already. Too much....I'm hoping we have less imports long term.
  13. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Decades of messaging saying these aren't good jobs. Must go to college. Must sit in a cubacle. Making econmics of manufacturing so difficult you can't pay enough to entice younger people. You expect the system to change overnight.
  14. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Nobody is irreplaceable - Thats the nature of corporate America. I feel confident in my skills so not worried. But can you be more specific. When will product shortages happen? WHat products? How many layoffs will we see? Where will unemployment go? BE SPECIFIC!
  15. thethe

    Economics Thread

    If I had my way - 100%. Chinese people are innocent though so it would be great if we could minimize pain on them as well. But again, you know something is broken but you just don't want to fix it. FREE TRADE!
  16. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Yes - They are short term disruptions. And you continue to dig deeper and deeper for when 26 rolls around and we have more free trade witht he world while CCP is further isolated. You are 'winning' now only because you live in the short term.
  17. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Cna you tell me what a 'wrecked' economy looks like? What are you expecting to see?
  18. thethe

    Economics Thread

    You know what you can't make up? Someone who says everyone is communist but refuses to change the nature of hte trading relationship with the CCP. Can't make it up....
  19. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Can you point to when I said that there wouldn't be short term disruptions? I always expected this to happen. You can't unwind decades of globalization and consolidation without ramifications.
  20. thethe

    Economics Thread

    Really - You want to go this route? You don't think this is a negotiation? You are that naive?
Back
Top