Search results

You're using the wrong head.

Yup, late night TV used to be a thing to just do. Now you can stream anything in the world. I could watch some late night content I don't care about, or King of the Hill, seems like an easy choice for me. You're also right about access. Back in the day people didn't have access to stars like...

I'm just pointing out that a network can do whatever they want. And most just let people sue them. Because tehy can often win. Fox was a cited bycause they literally lie over and over again on the air and they don't have any admonishments or anything.

When Fox Blatantly Lied, they had to be sued for something to come from them.

Don't forget a gay harem!

Such a snowflake.

Trump made it clear that he didn't care about the First Amendment or honestly any part of the constitution. And yet Free Speech absolutists still voted for him.

I wonder if the FCC chair did this to Fox if people would have the same tune.

Well it looks like Disney already caved https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/disneys-abc-pulls-jimmy-kimmel-live-fcc-chair-blasts-hosts-charlie-kir-rcna232033 Trump is easily the worst president ever.

I mean I don't care if ABC wants to fire him, it's their right. But coming from the head of the FCC it's a clear IMO Violation of the first amendment. And I'd say the same thing if Obama's FCC chair went after Fox News which told way more lies on air than Jimmy Kimmel.

SO what horror movie is this from?

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/fcc-jimmy-kimmel-charlie-kirk-monologue-1236373708/ Remember when republicans were up in arms about Twitter and facebook enforcing their ToS and banning users? Where's the same rage about the FCC threatening TV channels for saying things that are...

I dunno seems like a peaceful protester just touring the Bakersfield town hall.

Wow the twitter bots really wanted to send this one out.

I said that was my opinion days ago. After you prodded me over and over again when I said I wanted to wait for information. Like the facts are laid bare in this thread. I wasn't jumping to conclusions, I didn't present my personal theories or opinions until you asked me for them. I know this...

I don't think I said that. I think I said we don't really know his true motives. It could be simple, it could be more complex. I'm not here to spread fake news like sturg implying that mentally challenged old dude is a liberal because he has to be.

Facts I know are hard to grasp. When facts are absent you go to conspiracy theories. That's OK. The difference between us is I don't present opinions as facts. My Theories are theories. My facts are facts. Like fact, Stockholm is not more densely populated than New York.