Search results

Then you agree that burning the flag, in and of itself, is NOT an act that incites violence. It must be accompanied by some other action. And THAT action is the actual issue. Btw, I don’t see anywhere in Trump’s announcement where my scenario would spare Harry a year in prison.

Harry the hippie invites his neighbors over so they can burn his flag in his backyard. Their intent is to protest the government’s perceived lack of action on climate change. (Fails criteria 1) Everyone there not only agrees with the cause, but they’re all non-violent pacifists (Fails criteria...

You’ve done nothing to show why the flag burning in your situation is satisfying all three criteria. Or, any of the three, for that matter.

??? 0 of 3 are being met Your scenario is a violent riot is taking place and one person is burning a flag…you haven’t even attempted to show why the one person burning the flag is the cause of all the lawlessness around him.

No. The people breaking the laws should be charged. The person burning the flag isn’t breaking any laws and should not be charged. I don’t see why this is difficult.

You could’ve stopped at “so if there is a violent protest” If there’s a violent protest, people are breaking the law. I want them to be stopped and charged for their violence. The flag burning is irrelevant.

When it meets the criteria set forth in Brandenburg v Ohio, which I think did a pretty good job of laying out the threshold: Is there intent to provoke lawless action AND is the action likely to produce immediate violent behavior AND is the act explicitly advocating for violence/lawlessness...

Dementia Don was more in reference to his delivery of that 30 second incoherent bunch of nonsense. If SCOTUS overturned that ruling I would say they made a terrible mistake and got the case wrong.

…and on the flip side, seems Israel isn’t bummed at all to see their “genocide” stopped before they could finish the job.

This moron retweeted this …yesterday!

Dementia Don?

“I’ve studied this a long time” is a banger, lol

Or get rid of a clearly bad law

Guess we’ll see

I’d take the name of any singular individual, at this point.

If you don’t know their org chart, how can you be sure they don’t have a president?

I didn’t ask for the content of the conversations, I asked for the leaders of the organization. I don’t know what conversations David Stearns is having regarding the 26 Mets, but he’s certainly having them with owner Steve Cohen, manager Carlos Mendoza, SVP John Ricco, SVP Andy Green, the guy...

To borrow a phrase - HAHAHHAHAHAH

Who comprises the “leadership” of Antifa?

K, enjoy