Search results

We’re calling podcasters murderers for reporting on the murders of the government?

Well Pete made sure a few drug dealers were dead, so he had some wiggle room to get some pardon kickbacks from a richer drug dealer while keeping the ledger in the black. Shrewd work.

How much of this needs to be true for this to be worthy of impeachment?

What active and imminent threat could the floating survivors really pose to us?

This Christmas there’s no room at the Inn.

And an extra special Happy Thanksgiving to some lucky family next year.

There’s no principle these idiots won’t abandon if they think they can pull a gotcha on Trump.

I’ve been critical of both divisive rhetoric and the video by the lawmakers in question, but it doesn’t really matter if servicemen *think* it’s seditious or violent. They aren’t some sort of infallible authority on the subject of what words mean. I’m not either, but it takes a very odd...

Eh nothing. If someone calls that video violent rhetoric or sedition, they’re being an idiot.

The right just *really* hates free speech now.

There is absolutely nothing that the Democrats in that video said that could be construed as a call to action to harm service members. Suggesting that they are specifically to blame for this violence (or guilty of sedition in the first place) is pathetic.

This person was pretty clearly criticizing the White House, not the victims.

Nope, we’re just supposed to blame specific Democrats now:

These same clowns will respond to any negative sentiment about their operations by insisting they’re going after the worst of the worst. Sorry that people are taking your own talking points at face value, DHS.

Horrible news, hopefully it was just the one suspect they have in custody so they can throw the book at him.

People like this who have made entire careers out of blindly cheering on anything Trump does saying they have big issues if this race ends up being close is one of those things that brings a smile to my face.

Watching the MAGA movement is incredible because they touch on some issues I find genuinely important and traditionally unaddressed by the right and then throw out the dumbest possible leftist solution to that problem.

Also, I find this shtick of going after anti-white sentiment from individuals exhausting when you're pairing that with overly broad anti-woman/anti-Muslim sentiment. They’re just doing your own bit.

Whatever one thinks of Heather Cox Richardson’s politics or prose, this does bring me to a point that outlines why I think so poorly of Sturg and the Repeal the 19th Crowd’s arguments. She can articulate her reasoning for her vote far more thoroughly than many others, regardless of gender. She’s...