Search results

Exactly. As I said: Picking up the option wouldn’t indicate AA has money. Declining the option wouldn’t indicate AA has money. Therefore there’s nothing to glean from the move other than kinley is not worth $5.5m. That’s it. There’s no other possible indication.

This I agree with. AA has failed a lot of big moments in a row.

Just really disagree with the last sentence. Everything else together? Sure. Kinley’s option has zero bearing on that. Picking it up would’ve been a stupid ass move.

correct, it means nothing about available payroll.

And yeah until I see a site accurately rank Atlanta guys over multiple years, they can be pretty much ignored.

Tier 1 is “fantasy impact targets.” Considering Caminiti won’t be in the majors next year and he’s the best prospect, I’m not surprised. Kind of a silly tier tbh. Ritchie is going to be a useful major league pitcher next year though. Honestly that site and their rankings/ceilings don’t make...

You keep whining “logic” while applying absolutely none of it. “Any news that isn’t showing us he has money is unwelcome.” So what does the kinley move show us? Picking up the option would not indicate he has money, and it wouldn’t indicate the opposite either. Declining the option does not...

You said this in response to someone being concerned AA is broke because he declined kinley’s option. So way back on page 48, declining kinley’s option was an indicator to you. Suddenly, you are acknowledging it’s meaningless…which is what the sane side said right away. Take a nap dude

You are truly bizarre sometimes

This has been amongst the dumbest shit I’ve ever read here and that’s really saying something. So you are acknowledging that declining kinley’s option means nothing either way? Are you off your meds or something?

Wow. Wow. AA must have no money. Otherwise he would’ve picked up this option, because it’s a sound idea to pick it up. AA better prove he has money before FA begins or I’ll get even more upset.

..do we? I personally don’t, certainly not at this moment anyway. Do you have your “stupid argument” bot turned on and active here today?

Like, deciding to pay tyler kinley $5.5m would’ve eased some concerns, dog? It would’ve done the opposite for me. Bizarro chef today

Once again, who are you even talking about? I’m very concerned AA doesn’t have a lot of money. But I’m not stupid enough to believe letting kinley walk gives me any indication one way or another. In fact, I’d be more concerned about AA’s decision making if he thought paying tyler kinley $5.5m...

I think you can be concerned for several reasons, none of which include declining to pay tyler kinley $5.5m

Here’s my argument, I think it’s pretty simple: I have no idea if AA has the money I’ve been hoping he has. I am of the opinion that failure to extend Kim, a Boras client, doesn’t necessarily give me any indication either way. Who knows what Boras was asking for to keep Kim out of FA? Extremely...

Who exactly are you arguing against? Your imagination again? Who is trying to disprove he has no money…?

Your complete inability to be a normal, rational person when you’re worked up is very entertaining, not going to lie

There are 100 tyler kinleys available basically at all times. Deciding against paying him $5.5m is wayyyy preferable to paying it

Yikes. You’re right - it definitely isn’t.