Search results

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskEconomics/s/26aQ3Woh2l

An especially hearty lol

I actually think this might be true. Kash Patel is more interested in being a celebrity than doing actual FBI things, and that’s the best possible outcome.

He is not a serious person.

One of them was obviously not in his house because he was in prison, so you’re first assuming this is accurate. But you’re also assuming that if it is accurate, it must be because he’s aiding and abetting fugitives and not for any other possible reason. Yet you have no evidence to support this...

Welp, guess we can count on never seeing this deal.

As we’ve established, one of the two people he was allegedly aiding and abetting is in prison, and therefore he wasn’t doing that. How many hours do I need to wait for evidence from the government he was aiding and abetting the other person they were looking for?

Worth noting that whenever he’s been in office thus far it’s resulted in a poor result for the Republican Party.

As of now, what is he guilty of? Not producing his papers in his own home?

It’s been more than 72 hours already and all we’ve learned is that one of the two guys he was accused of harboring is in prison.

Exclusively Boomers took one look at the last year of Trump and thought “yeah, I was right to support this guy.”

Kind of seems like a good way to not earn contracts, actually.

Of course not, no serious conservative ever cared about the Epstein Files, you silly goose. Those dastardly Dems just want to distract us from Glorious Leader’s flawless and universally beloved performance as our President.

The right has gone so woke it’s now getting offended by pronoun jokes.

If he is hiding a sexual predator to help them evade deportation, 1. But we’re already halfway to this just being bullshit.

Crockett’s identity as a black woman is certainly not my issue with her. But while I wouldn’t describe her as uppity, I would describe her as an aggressively self-centered representative who is more focused on her personal brand than helping her constituents.

Well we’re already down to one fugitive he could have possibly been harboring.

Because the First Amendment still exists and the FACE Act is a specific carve-out? This isn’t really a pro-Don Lemon take, just a question on why he’d be arrested.

It’s an anti-intimidation law. If Lemon didn’t yell and demonstrate with the others he’s not in violation of the law.

Or don’t arrest him if there’s not enough evidence of wrongdoing for an arrest warrant? They’ve arrested 3 people already so it’s not like they’re refusing to let the DOJ do anything.