Search results

  1. acesfull86

    Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

    Fair…I do think the legacy of his court appointments will live on far longer, especially if he’s unable to codify things into law like the federal workforce reduction
  2. acesfull86

    Legal/scotus thread

    Hmm…
  3. acesfull86

    TRHLIM

    Ok
  4. acesfull86

    TRHLIM

    A clown point that you made! Who dragged Chase Oliver into a discussion about JD Vance not knowing the Constitution?
  5. acesfull86

    TRHLIM

    So...nothing. Good point.
  6. acesfull86

    Legal/scotus thread

    https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2026/02/why-the-lesser-included-action-argument-for-ieepa-tariffs-fails.html#comments The dissent pushes back with an intuitively appealing argument: IEEPA authorizes the President to prohibit imports entirely, so surely it authorizes the lesser...
  7. acesfull86

    TRHLIM

    I’d ask what Oliver similarly got wrong on the Constitution, but not sure I want to derail the thread given his irrelevance. No one voted for him, including me, and he’s not the VP of the United States, or the presumed front-runner for POTUS in 2028. Is there anything in that community note of...
  8. acesfull86

    TRHLIM

    I'm old enough remember you telling us the same thing about Tucker Carlson. And Kari Lake. And who could forget the slobbering over Steve Bannon?
  9. acesfull86

    TRHLIM

    He should be smart enough to find a way to do that without embarrassing himself
  10. acesfull86

    Economics Thread

    He should get credit for the good things he does and get criticism for the stupid, harmful things he does.
  11. acesfull86

    Legal/scotus thread

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/02/20/supreme-court-trump-tariffs/ No president has used IEEPA to impose tariffs, but it contains the phrase “regulate … importation.” Trump said that was sufficient authorization for him to throw out the rest of the tariff schedules and set import...
  12. acesfull86

    TRHLIM

    LOL. The Yale educated lawyer getting community noted on basic aspects of the Constitution, the document he's sworn in to uphold. Impressive fellow. MAGA really sending their best.
  13. acesfull86

    Economics Thread

    That’s a shame. Could consider sending them the ‘truflation’ and try to convince them that they actually didn’t pay more, or something?
  14. acesfull86

    TRHLIM

    Someone needs to tell him "quiet, piggy"
  15. acesfull86

    TRHLIM

    Really hope (R) nominates someone better
  16. acesfull86

    Economics Thread

    Trump's next move is to use Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows him to implement a maximum 15% tariff for a maximum of 150 days, based on an "emergency" balance-of-payments deficit. After 150 days, Congress must vote to extend the tariffs. Maybe Congress actually does its job and...
  17. acesfull86

    Economics Thread

    Self parody at this point
  18. acesfull86

    Economics Thread

    LMAO …lamenting “confusion and administrative bloat” as Trump spent the better part of the last 10 months coming up with a labyrinth of rules and exceptions, changing rates by the day based on tv commercials, phone calls, and mood swings. Your concerns ring a bit hollow, sorry.
  19. acesfull86

    Economics Thread

    Except the detour is not for nothing
  20. acesfull86

    Economics Thread

    If Trump had equally effective legal options, why didn’t he take those over the illegal option?
Back
Top