Search results

I remember being told on this platform that we should take Jensen Huang at his word when he called Trump’s tariffs “visionary” because he had enough money for the next hundreds of years. Does that same logic apply to the richest man on earth?

A leopard eating its face moment But it’s inherently a good thing for the owner of the biggest news platform who happens to be the richest man on earth to be an adversary to both political parties.

Related news, Tesla down 9% today

Being able to answer questions coherently is a skill that Jen Psanki and Karolibe Leavitt have in abundance that it was obvious to everyone in a matter of minutes KJP didn’t.

Hahahahahhahahahahahah Everyone on earth saw this coming

LOL

This is a funny little sub plot brewing

We can never reduce spending because ANY cut in spending is seen as immoral and people will die. Inversely, as spending has increased exponentially the last 5 years surely millions of lives would have been saved.

Per Stephen Miller of course

Can someone help inform Elon that he is now either a retarded libertarian or a part of the radical left for saying the bill will grow the deficit

Some call it telling the Emperor he doesn’t have new clothes

worthless

Well said Elon.

An analytical answer for this thread

Countries should just agree with something and drag their feet in the implementation for as long as they need to until QVC loses interest

Game 1 broke the Knicks. Shame

“Some” cost cuttings “later on” Eloquently stated Mr President.

I’ll settle for more fake ones like we got with UK and China

She’s an idiot. It was a 100% true, but we don’t need edgelords taunting the idiot