6/26 GDT: Keuchel at Cubs

The bar for "provocation" is set this low? Any data explaining why someone is wrong is "provocation"?

Can someone direct me to the safe place on these boards? I want to have a gluten free non-dairy organic cookie bouquet delivered there.

Enscheff said:
Gausman didn't have a track record that backed up his 2.3 fWAR in 2018?

That's certainly news to me, thanks for sharing.
Click to expand...

Enscheff said:
What he did in Atlanta last year was produce a 3.78 FIP and a 4.46 xFIP...values exactly in line with his career norms considering it was over 59 IP.

The only people who had unrealistic expectations for Gausman were folks fooled by the 2.87 ERA. Everyone else knew exactly what he was.

Oh, and the people who thought he had a "bad walk ratio" for the Braves were also a little...wrong.
Click to expand...
 
Enscheff said:
Sorry, sigs were not specified in the treaty.
Click to expand...

I don't mind sigs as long as you're not directly attacking someone in your sig. Quoting what they said is not namecalling.

However if your sig said something like "clvclv and crazytrain are complete morons" then yes there would be consequences.
 
Enscheff said:
The bar for "provocation" is set this low? Any data explaining why someone is wrong is "provocation"?

Can someone direct me to the safe place on these boards? I want to have a gluten free non-dairy organic cookie bouquet delivered there.
Click to expand...

This is an instance where I know everytime you talk about Gausman's BB ratio it is a direct attack on Crazytrain as your sig clearly doesn't hide it.

The treaty rules state:

Rules:
Enscheff will not engage in discourse unprovoked. This includes namecalling, callbacking, trashtalking, etc.



Callbacking is clear violation, and also breaks our principle agreement earlier in the season where you were not going to recycle the same insults and would get creative.
 
Individual-1 said:
This is an instance where I know everytime you talk about Gausman's BB ratio it is a direct attack on Crazytrain as your sig clearly doesn't hide it.

The treaty rules state:

Rules:
Enscheff will not engage in discourse unprovoked. This includes namecalling, callbacking, trashtalking, etc.



Callbacking is clear violation, and also breaks our principle agreement earlier in the season where you were not going to recycle the same insults and would get creative.
Click to expand...

LOL...

So we aren't allowed to point out that someone said something that ended up being wrong?

Seriously, where is this safe space you've set up? Am I currently in it?
 
Enscheff said:
LOL...

So we aren't allowed to point out that someone said something that ended up being wrong?

Seriously, where is this safe space you've set up? Am I currently in it?
Click to expand...

You've done it too many times.

And it's seeped into too many different threads.
 
giphy.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top