An Organization's Prerogatives in Deciding Who to Employ

I harken back to the discussion of the Washington Commanders' treatment of Jack del Rio. Organizations obviously have legal rights to in effect oppress employees in various ways. But it doesn't make it right. As I noted in the other thread the Commanders' treatment of del Rio was deplorable.

At the same time I noted that an organization had certain rights and even obligations to protect itself as well. If a CEO said women couldn't code or that some racial group was mentally inferior obviously it could and should terminate that CEO.
 
Back
Top