This is another deal I'm actually pretty happy with. Very low-risk, could be a solid reward at the deadline or if we decide to trade one of our other catchers. No complaints here.
What's the reward exactly?
Sounds like the Braves are uncertain about Pierzynski's Lairdership.
Sounds like the Braves are uncertain about Pierzynski's Lairdership.
His last name is easily rhymed with ****.
http://blogs.seattletimes.com/mariners/2014/07/07/roster-move-john-buck-designated-for-assignment/
After the Mariners 2-0 win over the Twins, the club announced that back-up catcher John Buck had been designated for assignment.
It was not a popular move amongst the players, many privately grumbling about the thinking behind it. Buck, a veteran, was well liked and respected amongst his teammates.
Still, there had been growing concern about Buck’s defense particularly receiving and blocking pitches from some of the Mariners’ power arms. This wasn’t based on just the one game on Sunday where Buck had his issues when Taijuan Walker’s command went erratic.This move had been discussed for more than a week.
Food for thought. I think Buck is a nice piece of catching depth, especially considering the free agent options left available. Was going to make a crack about 39 year old Jose Molina, but then realized that Pierzynski is 38 himself.
Noticed that Doumit is still unsigned -- wonder where he ends up this coming season. Could be a nice, cheap bench option with power for the right team.
Another day, another dollar. Wait ... did I do that right?
They just couldn't pass the . . .
The Braves bagged a . . .
A minor-league deal isn't a bad way to make . . .
You know who's going to be in the best shape of his life THIS spring training?
![]()
This is another deal I'm actually pretty happy with. Very low-risk, could be a solid reward at the deadline or if we decide to trade one of our other catchers. No complaints here.