Dominion vs Fox

57Brave

Well-known member
Let's try sticking to things that happened
///////////////////////////////


MeidasTouch
@MeidasTouch
·
13h
BREAKING: Rupert Murdoch and Fox colluded with Jared Kushner

and the Trump campaign and provided Kushner with access to

"Fox confidential information about Biden's ads, along with debate strategy"

and gave Kushner a preview of Biden's ads before they were public.


FqAVxLoakAEWqDR
 
Last edited:
Murdoch Acknowledges Fox News Hosts Endorsed Election Fraud Falsehoods
Rupert Murdoch, the conservative media mogul, spoke under oath last month in a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox by Dominion Voting Systems.




By Jeremy W. Peters and Katie Robertson
Feb. 27, 2023


Rupert Murdoch, chairman of the conservative media empire that owns Fox News, acknowledged in a deposition that several hosts for his networks promoted the false narrative that the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald J. Trump, and that he could have stopped them but didn’t, court documents released on Monday showed.

“They endorsed,” Mr. Murdoch said under oath in response to direct questions about the Fox hosts Sean Hannity, Jeanine Pirro, Lou Dobbs and Maria Bartiromo, according to a legal filing by Dominion Voting Systems. “I would have liked us to be stronger in denouncing it in hindsight,” he added, while also disclosing that he was always dubious of Mr. Trump’s claims of widespread voter fraud.

Asked whether he doubted Mr. Trump, Mr. Murdoch responded: “Yes. I mean, we thought everything was on the up-and-up.” At the same time, he rejected the accusation that Fox News as a whole had endorsed the stolen election narrative. “Not Fox,” he said. “No. Not Fox.”

Mr. Murdoch’s remarks, which he made last month as part of Dominion’s $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox, added to the evidence that Dominion has accumulated as it tries to prove its central allegation: The people running the country’s most popular news network knew Mr. Trump’s claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election were false but broadcast them anyway in a reckless pursuit of ratings and profit.

Proof to that effect would help Dominion clear the high legal bar set by the Supreme Court for defamation cases. To prevail, Dominion must show not only that Fox broadcast false information, but that it did so knowingly. A judge in Delaware state court has scheduled a monthlong trial beginning in April.

The new documents and a similar batch released this month provide a dramatic account from inside the network, depicting a frantic scramble as Fox tried to woo back its large conservative audience after ratings collapsed in the wake of Mr. Trump’s loss. Fox had been the first network to call Arizona for Joseph R. Biden on election night — essentially declaring him the next president. When Mr. Trump refused to concede and started attacking Fox as disloyal and dishonest, viewers began to change the channel.

The filings also revealed that top executives and on-air hosts had reacted with incredulity bordering on contempt to various fictitious allegations about Dominion. These included unsubstantiated rumors — repeatedly uttered by guests and hosts of Fox programs — that its voting machines could run a secret algorithm that switched votes from one candidate to another, and that the company was founded in Venezuela to help that country’s longtime leader, Hugo Chávez, fix elections.

.

READ DOCUMENT
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/02/27/business/media/dominion-fox-news.html


Despite those misgivings, little changed about the content on shows like Mr. Dobbs’s and Ms. Bartiromo’s. For weeks after the election, viewers of Fox News and Fox Business heard a far different story from the one that Fox executives privately conceded was real.

Lawyers for Fox News, which filed a response to Dominion in court on Monday, argued that its commentary and reporting after the election did not amount to defamation because its hosts had not endorsed the falsehoods about Dominion, even if Mr. Murdoch stated otherwise in his deposition. As such, the network’s lawyers argued, Fox’s coverage was protected under the First Amendment.
 
No doubt Republicans will be consistent and demand Fox News be held accountable for interfering in our election. Enemy of the people!
 
I’ll agree with that.

As long as we are consistent, and everyone involved in all government collusion with private entities lands everyone who touched those projects in Gitmo for life
 
It’s so funny when people talk about what’s “real” as if anyone actually knows since inspection was blocked.

All will be revealed in time. Just unfortunately for the world not fast enough.
 
MeidasTouch
@MeidasTouch
·
13h
BREAKING: Rupert Murdoch and Fox colluded with Jared Kushner
and the Trump campaign and provided Kushner with access to
"Fox confidential information about Biden's ads, along with debate strategy"
and gave Kushner a preview of Biden's ads before they were public.


All that unfair advantage, and they still couldn't win.

Voters must really have been tired of the MAGA regime. lol
 
It’s so funny when people talk about what’s “real” as if anyone actually knows since inspection was blocked.

All will be revealed in time. Just unfortunately for the world not fast enough.


So it would be fair to say we don't know if Trump "won" in 2016 since there was no inspection and his regime fought any and all attempts to inspect that election?
 
So it would be fair to say we don't know if Trump "won" in 2016 since there was no inspection and his regime fought any and all attempts to inspect that election?

There was a 4 year investigation that concluded HRC colluded with Russians. Where have you been?
 
Lol. Access to ads isn’t as bad as CNN leaking presidential debate questions to Hillary before the debate. Did 57 or Runnin have a problem with that?

HOw about the collusion of the same networks to nullify a democratically elected president with endless lies that they KNEW were lies at the time?

The outrage from the left is ALWAYS FAKE. They believe in NOTHING!
 
oh dear boy, this isn't about Hillary or FBI or any other punching bag you pull out. It is about

you have been lied to
--yet like a battered wife you you play daily you defend those that lie to you.

I'm reminded of David Koresh (?) James Jones and any other number of cult leaders the followers (enablers) blindly follow

Hillary, how silly
 
Last edited:
HOw about the collusion of the same networks to nullify a democratically elected president with endless lies that they KNEW were lies at the time?

The outrage from the left is ALWAYS FAKE. They believe in NOTHING!


Never thought I would see you call out Fox like this.
 
So let's be clear.
It is in court record, under oath with threat of being charged for perjury that the head of Fox admits his prime time hosts knowingly lied about the results of the 2020 election that you
even still today
repeated.

thing is, ever since 2016 I never blamed Trump.
I blamed the marks that were taken to the cleaners
 
You libs once again are being duped and don't event know it. Context is important, folks.
 
Last edited:
Fox News could clear all this up by just giving the court all that evidence of voter fraud. I wonder why all these high paid lawyers for the biggest media company in the country wouldn't give the court all this evidence that exonerated their client. Weird.
 
Back
Top