Maine's New Recycling Law

nsacpi

Expects Yuge Games
I hope Maine enacts this law.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/06/13/maine-recycling-producer-responsibility/

TRENTON, Me. — At the height of tourist season, the recycling bins at this coastal town used to swell with glass and plastic, office paper and piles of cardboard from the local boatyard. But the bins are gone, and their contents now join the trash, destined either for an incinerator to generate electricity or a landfill.

Trenton is one of many Maine towns that had to cut back or close their recycling operations after events both global and local. In 2018 China, which used to take much of America’s plastic waste, banned most of those imports. Last year, a plant in Hampden, Me., that promised to provide state-of-the-art recycling for more than 100 municipalities shut down.

With mountains of boxes and bubble wrap from online pandemic shopping now going in the trash, lawmakers are trying to make Maine the first state to shift some of the costs of its recycling onto companies — not taxpayers. If the bipartisan bill passes, Maine will join several Canadian provinces, including neighboring Quebec, and all European countries, which have for decades relied on so-called extended producer responsibility programs, or EPR, for packaging.

“It’s good that the bottom fell out,” said Rep. Nicole Grohoski (D-Ellsworth), the bill’s Democratic sponsor, whose district includes Trenton. She doesn’t believe the old system of shipping products halfway around the world to China made sense as countries try to reduce their carbon footprints.

“We have to face this problem and use our own ingenuity to solve it,” Grohoski said.

The proposed legislation, which is vehemently opposed by representatives for Maine’s retail and food producing industries, would charge large packaging producers for collecting and recycling materials as well as for disposing of non-recyclable packaging. The income generated would be reimbursed to communities like Trenton to support their recycling efforts. EPR programs already exist in many states for a variety of toxic and bulky products including pharmaceuticals, batteries, paint, carpet and mattresses. At least a dozen states, from New York to California and Hawaii, have been working on similar bills for packaging.
 
Just to explain a little why I think this is a great idea. My neighbor is constantly getting stuff from Amazon Prime. Good for him. But our town bears the cost of dealing with his mounds of packaging material. Both he and I contribute to the town budget. So I'm subsidizing his "habit." Even worse, I'm also subsidizing Amazon.

Under a law like the one being considered in Maine he and Amazon will jointly bear the costs of their transactions. And I, an innocent bystander, will no longer have to foot part of the bill. A classic example of an externality.
 
Last edited:
An often overlooked benefit of our recyclables no longer going to China is that some of those companies are known to have been dumping it in the ocean before they ever made it to China. I would rather it be in a landfill than a whale's stomach.
 
An often overlooked benefit of our recyclables no longer going to China is that some of those companies are known to have been dumping it in the ocean before they ever made it to China. I would rather it be in a landfill than a whale's stomach.

We dump way too many of our various problems into places where we don't have to look at the consequences.
 
Back
Top