I don't agree with her choice but then I wasn't in her shoes. If that's how she "wanted" to end it, then I'm glad she had the choice to do so.
AA, isn't the Church against suicide?
However one wants to paint how she died, it was suicide
Why?
Her family would be racking up $1000's in costs to keep her alive for no reason. Why should they be punished TWICE, first her death and then paying for those medical bills keeping her alive. Do you honestly think the hospital is going to let that go?
If you got diagnosed with terminal cancer, and chose not to treat it, would you consider that "suicide?"
I personally don't think you can put a price on the time spent with loved ones. Call me selfish if you want, but I want every minute possible,.
Again, not in her shoes. Not judging her as a person. That doesn't mean I have to agree with her choice. But it was her choice to make and if that's what she wanted to do, I'm glad she had that option.
Vatican believes so. I Have no problem with what this lady did and I'd have no problem if a family member had to make this difficult choice one day.
But it does open a Pandora's box: What if someone had a severe case of schizophrenia and couldn't function in this world? Should they be allowed to end thier life?
What about a mentally or physically handicapped person who can't function without a caretaker? Should they be allowed to?
Do we, physically and mentally able bodied people, have the right to tell people who can't function on thier own that they have to suck it up and live in a world that they aren't able to by themselves? I don't think we can.