Tapate50
Well-known member
I thought he was talking in terms of money.
If money is no object, then new list.
Really meant rock solid production...reliability. We have struggled in this area of late.
I thought he was talking in terms of money.
If money is no object, then new list.
Really meant rock solid production...reliability. We have struggled in this area of late.
I'd love to have Uribe back. The only good thing about the weekend series was watching Uribe play baseball.
With all the pitching assets the Braves have acquired in the past year, I don't see them going after Price. I think the idea of this FO is to build the rotation from within and fill gaps in the lineups with FA.
Only problem is the FA market is pretty weak for hitting minus Jason, Justin, and Cespedes.
Speaking of Justin, he's been pretty meh for a while now.
April: 21-82 (.259 AVG), 6 homers, 14 RBIs, May: 37-108 (.343), 6 homers, 23 RBIs, .418 OBP, June: 19-97 (.196), 2 homers, 9 RBIs, .319 OBP, July: 4-34 (.118), 0 homers, 2 RBIs, .162 OBP.
That's just not good. I'm sure he will get hot and get back on it, but that is pretty alarming as he's really only had ONE good month, one solid and two terrible.
It is odd though, as his bat has been terrible at Petco with a .306 at home and only .208 away.
Such an odd hitter. Very good, but odd.
I'd put Greinke and Price pretty even. If he opts out I'd go after Greinke.
I'd like to see the Braves add one core position player via trade who is young and controllable. Preferably C or 3B. We'll need to part with some prospects at positions of depth (SP and MI).
Beyond that, I'm hoping they will continue to look for "buy low" opportunities with free agents and salary dump acquisitions. Target guys who can be acquired or signed for 1-2 years. Downside risk is low, and they become trade assets if we fall out of contention. It's not as sexy as discussing Price or Greinke, but I think it's a low-risk way to build a 2016 wild card contender. I have no interest in winning the 2015-2016 offseason.