Yeah but what about the old guys that aren’t senile? They shouldn’t be punished.
That’s fine but it doesn’t mean you are fit for government office
Would be fun if the most powerful people in our lives weren't older than the life expectancy
There are 30 year olds I wouldn’t trust with elementary school work while thee are 80 year olds that are sharper than anyone on this forum.
Term limits and age limits aren’t necessary. Just common sense from the voting masses not to elect people that require the entire CVS storehouse to function.
Term limits and age limits aren’t necessary. Just common sense from the voting masses not to elect people that require the entire CVS storehouse to function.
I like the idea though I do understand why a congress term limit would differ. You do want the people in charge of passing laws to be held accountable for the effects of that legislation. If someone knows they’ll only be around a couple years (or in their final term) that accountability element is gone. Though the French had a good way to circumvent that with the National Assembly during the French Revolution, so maybe the guillotine is a tidy solution to that problem.While I agree with your sentiment, if you're gonna have limits for executive positions (President, Governor, Mayor, etc) then you should kind of have it across the board.
IMO
6 consecutive Terms for a House member (12 years)
2 consecutive Terms for a Senate member (12 years).
While I agree with your sentiment, if you're gonna have limits for executive positions (President, Governor, Mayor, etc) then you should kind of have it across the board.
IMO
6 consecutive Terms for a House member (12 years)
2 consecutive Terms for a Senate member (12 years).
65? 65 isn’t old.
65? 65 isn’t old.