My favorite line in the story: "The same day Assange falsely hinted that Rich may have been his source for DNC emails". First of all, how can you falsely hint something unproven? Also, Assange that pedler of falsehoods. Oh wait.. He has an immaculate factual record. This is so obviously a partisan soaked, revisionist propaganda piece. No one knows to this day who killed Seth Rich. (Botched robbery lol) But the conspiracy didn't start in Russia. It started with anons in /pol/, self-declared "autists" if you will, obsessing about Podesta and DNC email leaks, Assange, and ongoing events and timelines and loosely piecing together plausible narratives. Is it a conspiracy theory? Yes. But please, keep on buying into Russia siding with Conservatives to beat the Socialist Dems. It makes SO MUCH SENSE /s