Why Rand Paul can't be taken seriously...

Ron Paul could sure hit the ball.

ron_paul_swinger.jpg
 
I like that he's pointing out the hypocrisy of this stupid war on women thing. Only the real dullards actually believe the pubs are fighting a war on women.

Probably shouldn't have used the term sexual predator as that's such a loaded phrase these days. But there's no doubt that Clinton is a known sexual harasser, and it's true that he's beloved by many feminists. Usually crump likes pointing out hypocrisy, but I guess not in this case.

I do agree with crump's main point though that stuff like this won't help Paul. It's not very presidential. The biggest thing though is that he's too much of a libertarian to win anything. JMO.
 
Still not convinced that a faction of the GOP doesn't still view women as housewives while men do all the work.

Perhaps War on Women is hyperbole, but there is something there.

Men can get Viagra on healthcare for ED, but women can't get birth control. Not every woman that gets birth control is a slut.

As Dalyn said before, I'm pretty much for anything to help stagnate the population growth as we're going to be running out on drinking water and real sources sooner than we think.
 
KeithLockhart said:
Still not convinced that a faction of the GOP doesn't still view women as housewives while men do all the work.

Perhaps War on Women is hyperbole, but there is something there.

Men can get Viagra on healthcare for ED, but women can't get birth control. Not every woman that gets birth control is a slut.

As Dalyn said before, I'm pretty much for anything to help stagnate the population growth as we're going to be running out on drinking water and real sources sooner than we think.
Click to expand...

War on blacks?
 
The underlying thing I've taken from about 50% of the threads on this page is that KL pretty much hates old people for thinking and being old. Change isn't just like flipping a light switch, it takes a ton of time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top