Latest activity

it is because they needed him at that time and the other options were going to cost money and prospects.. Why you trade for a salary...

When you said he had negative trade value, I assumed you were saying he had negative trade value. My bad. Not sure how I mixed that up.

So you just don’t know what the word “negative” means. Got it.

So they are simultaneously willing to pay him that contract but also unwilling because…reasons. Got it. Makes total sense. Of course...

I think you guys are now trying to claim some sort of victory on the word negative... it is not that deep and you can clearly see that I...

Because the team has no negotiating power on a waiver deal. They may take a chance because they have the money. That doesn't mean they...

Lol claiming off waivers is exactly the same as paying them that contract as a FA…the refusal to admit that saying Murphy has negative...

Wait what? If you claim a guy off waivers you are exactly taking on that contract. Why would someone do that and not be willing to give...

I am not in favor of trading players at their lowest value. I’m not sure who said he has great trade value but I guess it’s straw man...

Wait what? If you claim a guy off waivers you are exactly taking on that contract. Why would someone do that and not be willing to give...

So should the Braves trade Murph?? Lets ask that question. reasons for: he is making 15 million the addition of Yaz pushes him or...

You could be correct if the Rangers didn’t have a major need for a C in a very thin market for Catchers. Scarcity matters.

The entire point of ALL of this, is you said Murphy easily clears 3/45. That's certainly not a sure thing with his injury. Would Texas...

I’m pushing back on the claim he has “negative” value. That’s pretty absurd.

someone would trade at least something of real value for him. Im not even sure how that’s debatable.