We can discuss money, but at least with Albies he had proven himself in AAA with his figure it out stretch that started in May and really picked up ground after coming off the DL. With Swanson there was no good reason at all for him to skip AAA or even leave AA outside of "appease the fans".
Aggression with prospects is fine, but being stupid is not. There should be a way to find a happy medium between a Pirates like idea of being overly cautious with prospects and going stupidly fast with prospects.
That's a break.
As much as clv was being kinda crazy a while back when he claimed FA and players might not sign with the Braves because we kept players in the minors/sent them to AAA, there is a human aspect to the game that matters in that respect. If we kept Albies in AAA for a third year simply to save money when their was an opening at 2B, he is most likely going to get pissed, for good reason. And Albies is young enough (unlike Swanson) that he would be the type of player we want to see the Braves give the Julio/Simba type of extension to when we buy out his FA years. There is no reason to ruin a chance of that happening by doing something (keeping him down for a third season of AAA) there is no justification for outside of simply being cheap.
If Albies winds up signing away 2-3 years of FA for cheap it will be worth more/as much as the one extra season as a possible super two anyway, and wouldn't make the Braves look like douchebags.
Kemp should have a defensive replacement now that his at-bat in the 8th is over.
Garmel (08-26-2017)
Yep, exactly. Swanson wasn't performing great at AA at the time, there was zero justification for the move other than "the FO knows best and has access to things you don't". You weren't posting here at the time, but I was one of the people driving the bus on the Swanson callup being a mistake. Heck, Enscheff wasn't even all that worried about Swanson being called up at the time because he thought the player control rules would change with the CB agreement and make it not matter (and that argument actually made me take a wait and see attitude). Obviously nothing changed there with the CB, so all three of us and many others are justifiably annoyed with the Swanson situation.
I get annoyed with our FO when they do wacky stuff that seems dumb and isn't normal compared to what other good FO in baseball would do. The Swanson move was one of those times. Albies has played over all full in AAA, and was performing well in the last couple months before being called up, his callup is pretty normal and something pretty much all FO in baseball would do.
I think they feel they can sign early extensions with some guys (like Ender), and the ones that won't (like Heyward), they will trade.
This just isn't true. I've shown promoting Trout cost the Angels ~$12M in the season he would have been Arb4 as a super 2, and that was after signing him to a remarkably team friendly extension.
No matter how you slice it, every one of these early promotions is going to cost the Braves $10M+ during the year in question. And that's the best case scenario. The worst case scenario is they completely lose a year from that player.
All for what? Good will with the player? Some casual fan excitement in a lost season? Doesn't seem remotely worth it.
But hey, at least they aren't going to trade him for pitching. I guess that's good news.
Looking good, viz
That'll probably do it.
We gotta find ourselves a real closer.
You and I are and were on same page about both of them.
I don't think any organization manages every player to max service time.
I will say that I think both were guys that the Braves had decided were their starter the following season so they decided to look at them. Still made no sense to promote someone that hadn't mastered AA.
I think your man Markakis might be the reason Acuna might not be up till late April.
Unless they move him this offseason. Will be interesting to watch those moves.