Page 30 of 143 FirstFirst ... 2028293031324080130 ... LastLast
Results 581 to 600 of 2853

Thread: 2018 Trade Deadline ROSTERBATION

  1. #581
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Not even close to enough for DeGrom.

    He is going to provide a contender a huge upgrade this year. He is probably going to project to 2-3 wins the rest of the way, at a cost of ~$3M. Elite SPs carry a huge premium for contenders, so I'd estimate his 2018 surplus value alone to be roughly $60M.

    He is then under control for another 2 seasons, and will make about $25M-$30M via arbitration. He will easily be projected for ~10 wins over those 2 season, which represents another $70M in surplus value.

    That's a total of $130M in surplus value to get DeGrom.

    Propects are valued roughly as:

    FV 75 = $175M
    FV 70 = $107M
    FV 65 = $70M
    FV 60 = $60M
    FV 55 = $38M
    FV 50 = $20M
    FV 45 = $11M
    FV 40 = $5M

    The Braves simply don't have a headliner worthy of DeGrom (other than Acuna and Albies), and the Mets would be foolish to take a handful of 55s and 50s worth $20M-$40M each when they can get 60 as the centerpiece...as these TOR guys with control always net in the return package.
    How much surplus value do you think Newk has?

  2. #582
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,710
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,444
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,801
    Thanked in
    2,021 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBravos View Post
    How much surplus value do you think Newk has?
    I don't think the Mets would have a ton of interest in a deal with Newk as the centerpiece, tbh. He'll have used up his cheap control years and be nearing the end of his control years by the time they are ready to compete. He only comes with 3 extra years of control than DeGrom does.

  3. #583
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    I don't think the Mets would have a ton of interest in a deal with Newk as the centerpiece, tbh. He'll have used up his cheap control years and be nearing the end of his control years by the time they are ready to compete. He only comes with 3 extra years of control than DeGrom does.
    Three years is a lot ....five years is a ton.

  4. #584
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,572
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,052
    Thanked in
    6,147 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBravos View Post
    How much surplus value do you think Newk has?
    He's a 50 with lots of control and significant BP risk. I would say he's worth in the neighborhood of $40M. He's in that grey area where he can no longer be valued as a risky pitching prospect, yet doesn't have enough of a MLB track record to make projections based on subtracting projected arbitration paydays from performance value. He would be a very strong secondary piece in a DeGrom package, but not the headliner.

    Due to the struggles/injuries of Soroka, Gohara and Wright, the Braves don't have a headliner for a DeGrom package (other than Acuna and Ablies, which isn't happening). If one of those pitchers had taken a step forward this year, the Braves would likely have the FV 60 guy needed to get DeGrom...but it would have been silly to trade such a good young SP for an older SP.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 07-09-2018 at 01:09 PM.

  5. #585
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,371
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    799
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,735
    Thanked in
    2,022 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    He's a 50 with lots of control and significant BP risk. I would say he's worth in the neighborhood of $40M. He's in that grey area where he can no longer be valued as a risky pitching prospect, yet doesn't have enough of a MLB track record to make projections based on subtracting projected arbitration paydays from performance value. He would be a very strong secondary piece in a DeGrom package, but not the headliner.

    Due to the struggles/injuries of Soroka, Gohara and Wright, the Braves don't have a headliner for a DeGrom package (other than Acuna and Ablies, which isn't happening). If one of those pitchers had taken a step forward this year, the Braves would likely have the FV 60 guy needed to get DeGrom...but it would have been silly to trade such a good young SP for an older SP.
    Yeah, I'd be open to dealing Newk, but only to a team that is kind of in love and will overpay for him.

  6. #586
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,572
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,052
    Thanked in
    6,147 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    Yeah, I'd be open to dealing Newk, but only to a team that is kind of in love and will overpay for him.
    Some team may value him as a 10+ win guy over the next 5 years with a surplus value in the range of $70M.

    That team could very well be the Braves. If that team isn’t the Braves, they would do well to trade him to that other team. I suspect that team would be one of the dumber teams in the league, so it’s possible the Mets are that team.

  7. #587
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    53,443
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,022
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,184
    Thanked in
    5,832 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Some team may value him as a 10+ win guy over the next 5 years with a surplus value in the range of $70M.

    That team could very well be the Braves. If that team isn’t the Braves, they would do well to trade him to that other team. I suspect that team would be one of the dumber teams in the league, so it’s possible the Mets are that team.
    Assuming health, I'll take the over on 10 wins over 5 years

  8. #588
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,572
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,052
    Thanked in
    6,147 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    Assuming health, I'll take the over on 10 wins over 5 years
    "Barring health" isn't a valid qualifier with pitchers.

    We will see who was right about Newk in due time. I realize folks are still holding out hope that I'm wrong.

  9. #589
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    38,300
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    406
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,372
    Thanked in
    3,739 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    "Barring health" isn't a valid qualifier with pitchers.

    We will see who was right about Newk in due time. I realize folks are still holding out hope that I'm wrong.
    Newcomb is at 1.3 fWAR and 1.4 bWAR so far this season. You're basically saying newcomb is as good as he will ever get 37 starts into his career. You may be right, but that seems pretty bold

  10. #590
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,572
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,052
    Thanked in
    6,147 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Newcomb is at 1.3 fWAR and 1.4 bWAR so far this season. You're basically saying newcomb is as good as he will ever get 37 starts into his career. You may be right, but that seems pretty bold
    There is nothing bold about it. It's how pitchers tend to age.

    Newk's improving control is racing against his declining stuff, as is the case with most pitchers in their mid-20s.

    I know folks are desperate for me to be wrong, so I fully expect the usual backlash.

  11. #591
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    53,443
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,022
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,184
    Thanked in
    5,832 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    There is nothing bold about it. It's how pitchers tend to age.

    Newk's improving control is racing against his declining stuff, as is the case with most pitchers in their mid-20s.

    I know folks are desperate for me to be wrong, so I fully expect the usual backlash.
    For the record, I couldn't care less if you're wrong.

    I just see that he averages 2.4 fWAR/180 IP so far, and am also seeing improved control, and therefore am willing to say he will surpass 10 wins as long as he doesn't blow his arm out

  12. #592
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,287
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    954
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    694
    Thanked in
    491 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    There is nothing bold about it. It's how pitchers tend to age.

    Newk's improving control is racing against his declining stuff, as is the case with most pitchers in their mid-20s.

    I know folks are desperate for me to be wrong, so I fully expect the usual backlash.
    Great post... until you added the inflammatory last sentence.

  13. #593
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    For the record, I couldn't care less if you're wrong.

    I just see that he averages 2.4 fWAR/180 IP so far, and am also seeing improved control, and therefore am willing to say he will surpass 10 wins as long as he doesn't blow his arm out
    I’m kinda the same way. Big guy with a easy delivery. I don’t see his stuff declining much over the next five years. Now how he pitches...who knows. I can definitely see someone gambling on a big lefty. They do t grow on trees.

  14. #594
    Called Up to the Major Leagues SJ24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    1,964
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    30
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    399
    Thanked in
    291 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Not even close to enough for DeGrom.

    He is going to provide a contender a huge upgrade this year. He is probably going to project to 2-3 wins the rest of the way, at a cost of ~$3M. Elite SPs carry a huge premium for contenders, so I'd estimate his 2018 surplus value alone to be roughly $60M.

    He is then under control for another 2 seasons, and will make about $25M-$30M via arbitration. He will easily be projected for ~10 wins over those 2 season, which represents another $70M in surplus value.

    That's a total of $130M in surplus value to get DeGrom.

    Propects are valued roughly as:

    FV 75 = $175M
    FV 70 = $107M
    FV 65 = $70M
    FV 60 = $60M
    FV 55 = $38M
    FV 50 = $20M
    FV 45 = $11M
    FV 40 = $5M

    The Braves simply don't have a headliner worthy of DeGrom (other than Acuna and Albies), and the Mets would be foolish to take a handful of 55s and 50s worth $20M-$40M each when they can get 60 as the centerpiece...as these TOR guys with control always net in the return package.
    A $33 million contender's premium?

  15. #595
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    He's a 50 with lots of control and significant BP risk. I would say he's worth in the neighborhood of $40M. He's in that grey area where he can no longer be valued as a risky pitching prospect, yet doesn't have enough of a MLB track record to make projections based on subtracting projected arbitration paydays from performance value. He would be a very strong secondary piece in a DeGrom package, but not the headliner.

    Due to the struggles/injuries of Soroka, Gohara and Wright, the Braves don't have a headliner for a DeGrom package (other than Acuna and Ablies, which isn't happening). If one of those pitchers had taken a step forward this year, the Braves would likely have the FV 60 guy needed to get DeGrom...but it would have been silly to trade such a good young SP for an older SP.
    Ok....ok. Scratch Newk, but I will give them Wisler, Sims, Julio AND Danny Santana. Who says no to that??

  16. #596
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,882
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,394
    Thanked in
    7,543 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SJ24 View Post
    A $33 million contender's premium?
    about right
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  17. #597
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,783
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,493
    Thanked in
    1,152 Posts
    For Braves the one player is Allard -- part of Machado trade or for controllable reliever like Brad Hand.

    http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/2...trade-deadline

    While there, scroll down for the article on the shift. Very good interviews with players on the the thought process there.

  18. #598
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,572
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,052
    Thanked in
    6,147 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SJ24 View Post
    A $33 million contender's premium?
    Ask daddy about it the next time you guys are discussing athletes after your econ class at the local community college.

  19. #599
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,029
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,953
    Thanked in
    1,361 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Ask daddy about it the next time you guys are discussing athletes after your econ class at the local community college.
    what's wrong with community college..?
    "Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly

    “I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg

  20. #600
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    38,300
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    406
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,372
    Thanked in
    3,739 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Super View Post
    what's wrong with community college..?
    Everything! You should never go to community college over a 4-year university!

    Just in case carter Stewart is reading ;) lol

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to msstate7 For This Useful Post:

    thewupk (07-10-2018)

Similar Threads

  1. Post-Trade Deadline Rosterbation Discussion
    By salmagundy in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 08-01-2019, 04:03 PM
  2. Post-Trade Deadline Analysis: Is there Reason To Believe© for 2018?
    By The Chosen One in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-31-2018, 06:55 PM
  3. Trade Deadline: What are you willing to do?
    By Horsehide Harry in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 419
    Last Post: 07-28-2016, 09:01 PM
  4. MLB Trade Deadline Discussion
    By NinersSBChamps in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 960
    Last Post: 08-06-2014, 03:22 PM
  5. Trade Deadline Day
    By bravesnumberone in forum 2013 Legendary
    Replies: 253
    Last Post: 08-02-2013, 09:08 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •