We know exactly what they meant because they told us all in their writings like the federalist papers
We know exactly what they meant because they told us all in their writings like the federalist papers
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
we disagree
based on reading the words without qualification,
again, is this an NRA or Federalist interpretation ?
because I doubt seriously you or anyone here is an 18th century constitutional scholar
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
That's not what the federalist papers were. And they didn't agree in them.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed29.asp
Where in there does it say a homie can walk around the streets strapped with a nine?
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
Tapate50 (06-24-2022), zitothebrave (06-24-2022)
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed29.asp
I fail to see what this has to do with unfettered access to and carrying weapons in the open
and to your point, regulated means regulated
reg·u·late
/ˈreɡyəˌlāt/
verb
past tense: regulated; past participle: regulated
control or maintain the rate or speed of (a machine or process) so that it operates properly.
"a hormone that regulates metabolism and organ function"
control or supervise (something, especially a company or business activity) by means of rules and regulations.
"the organization that regulates fishing in the region"
set (a clock or other apparatus) according to an external standard.
"the standard time by which other clocks were regulated"
////////////////////////////
I unlike my conservative brethren do not worship at the alter of original intent
this is the 21st cwntury where blood letting is no longer the cure
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Do a search on what "well regulated definition 1776" and see what I'm talking about. You do realize that using the modern definition that the Amendment contradicts itself so it can't be correct.
I guess CNN is using right wing sources here I guess. https://constitutioncenter.org/image...CNN_Aug_11.pdf
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Also true.
The left kept pushing and pushing and finally got pushed back. This case never would have existed without this
applying 18th century meanings to 21st century situations is bass ackwards
shoot we are learning that applying what was standard understanding 50 years ago to today is a fools errand
Last edited by 57Brave; 06-24-2022 at 05:07 PM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
not arguing that
in fact agree with that
which speaks to voter suppression
and the barriers laid out to facilitate every adult person has
unfettered access to vote.
Did you know that in New Zealand (Australia ?) voting is mandatory ?
Polling agrees with me --- voting not so muxh
/////
but, lets go back to recent history where the candidate with the fewer votes got to appoint 3 SC Justices in 4 years
which is where our support as citizens breathes
Last edited by 57Brave; 06-24-2022 at 05:15 PM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.