Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

I am still waiting for someone be to point out which pulitzer prize winning articles regarding the Russia investigation were not accurate.
 
Perhaps you should read the Durham report which was critical of the awards given to the newspapers because they were not accurate. The fact that Trump wasn't charged with anything should tell you something.
 
Again, you use Trump not being indicted as proof he did nothing wrong then cry when he is indicted. All of the Pulitzer prize winning articles were about specific things and not "Trump collusion with Russia proven" type headlines. Some examples of the headlines for these stories were "FBI was to pay author of dossier", "Sessions met twice with Russians", 'unlikely source propelled Russian meddling inquiry" and "Trump's actions now a focus of Mueller investigation". I fail to see anything that was inaccurate in these stories. You people like Trump try to portray anyone that covered the story as 100% confirmed and Trump is going to be arrested and removed as soon as the Mueller report comes out which is what you people try to revise history to accuse them of.



The only erroneous reporting I saw was that Mueller was looking at Trump's financial history with Russian he did not. And I ams several others bought into that, which I have admitted to.
 
Last edited:
As some of us said from day 1 of the Mar a Lago raid it’s always been about the declassified documents that incriminate the Hussein cartel.

Anyone that treated this as anything other than a joke is complicit.
 
So let me get this straight. Trump has documents that incriminate Barack Obama and instead of declassifying and releasing them to the public he took them with him to Maralago...... That makes no sense. You aren't a serious person.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Your go to response when you have no argument. You just assumed what these articles said because you believe anything Trump says. Now that you see they were accurate you run away.
Click to expand...

lol

They're not even close to being accurate.

You might be able to find one or two that fit your description if you look real hard. Most of them were full of **** conspiracy nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Durham points out that a December NY Times 2017 article was false. The article with the false info is below.

"Durham highlights a Times report from December 2017, which claimed that in May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to Donald Trump, 'made a startling revelation' to Australia's top diplomat in Britain.

Namely: 'Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton' and 'Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs Clinton'.

Yet the Australian diplomat in question - Alexander Downer - told the Durham probe that 'Papadopoulos made no mention of Clinton emails, dirt or any specific approach by the Russian government to the Trump campaign'.

In fact, Durham found the Papadopoulos information was so not 'startling' that agents immediately dismissed it.

But The NYT report was critical in triggering the FBI probe into Donald Trump's alleged collusion with Russia, which the Durham report has now found should never have been launched."

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/...-investigation-began-george-papadopoulos.html
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
Durham points out that a December NY Times 2017 article was false. The article with the false info is below.

"Durham highlights a Times report from December 2017, which claimed that in May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to Donald Trump, 'made a startling revelation' to Australia's top diplomat in Britain.

Namely: 'Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton' and 'Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs Clinton'.

Yet the Australian diplomat in question - Alexander Downer - told the Durham probe that 'Papadopoulos made no mention of Clinton emails, dirt or any specific approach by the Russian government to the Trump campaign'.

In fact, Durham found the Papadopoulos information was so not 'startling' that agents immediately dismissed it.

But The NYT report was critical in triggering the FBI probe into Donald Trump's alleged collusion with Russia, which the Durham report has now found should never have been launched."

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/...-investigation-began-george-papadopoulos.html
Click to expand...



So one aspect in one article may not have been 100% correct. Papadopulos did have contact with Russians and lied about it to the FBI. He pled guilty to it. His own communications showed Papasmurf there was trying to set up a meeting between Russians and Trump and that the campaign was aware of it. I dont know how the allegation was so not startling that agents immediately dismissed it but apparently then read it in the NY times and began an investigation. You know what gets investigations started? When they ask people about allegations and they lie about it. Which Trump campaign officials seemed to be do quite a lot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top