119th Congress or Red Wave In Adult Land

sturg33 said:
Massie pointed out 4 things that have gotten worse. You say he is wrong. Which of those 4 is he wrong about?
Click to expand...

Because he's not telling the complete truth about the spending. Hell, Johnson has been going pretty much down the line with what McCarthy was doing from I've read. Yes, the spending is too high under Johnson but it's just a continuation of McCarthy.

Massie is talking about the extended spying when McCarthy has done nothing about it either.

Massie complains about the majority shrinking when that's the fault of that little bitch McCarthy and that other guy for quitting, not Johnson.

Massie is being disingenuous when he says things have gotten worse when Johnson is just following the same BS that McCarty has done.

It irks me when Massie sticks up for that piece of **** RINO McCarthy and goes after Johnson while he's been there for just a small time.

If the Senate republicans ousts Mitch in a coup and gets replaced by a MAGA member are you going to let these RDS influencers convince you how much better things were under Mitch's leadership as well so you can show up thethe in your mind? Just wondering.
 
Garmel said:
Because he's not telling the complete truth about the spending. Hell, Johnson has been going pretty much down the line with what McCarthy was doing from I've read. Yes, the spending is too high under Johnson but it's just a continuation of McCarthy.

Massie is talking about the extended spying when McCarthy has done nothing about it either.

Massie complains about the majority shrinking when that's the fault of that little bitch McCarthy and that other guy for quitting, not Johnson.

Massie is being disingenuous when he says things have gotten worse when Johnson is just following the same BS that McCarty has done.

It irks me when Massie sticks up for that piece of **** RINO McCarthy and goes after Johnson while he's been there for just a small time.

If the Senate republicans ousts Mitch in a coup and gets replaced by a MAGA member are you going to let these RDS influencers convince you how much better things were under Mitch's leadership as well so you can show up thethe in your mind? Just wondering.
Click to expand...

Massie point is that the removal of McCarthy has only so far had negative consequences. He is not attacking Johnson. Massie correctly warned Gaetz that the GOP did not have the numbers to pull such a stunt and that is playing out right in front of us.

I want cochise Mitch sent to GITMO, but if MAGA forces him out and it results in more advancement of the left, then I would not support that

I'd like for MAGA to stack a win or two before they command I trust them. All I see is failure
 
Garmel said:
Because he's not telling the complete truth about the spending. Hell, Johnson has been going pretty much down the line with what McCarthy was doing from I've read. Yes, the spending is too high under Johnson but it's just a continuation of McCarthy.

Massie is talking about the extended spying when McCarthy has done nothing about it either.

Massie complains about the majority shrinking when that's the fault of that little bitch McCarthy and that other guy for quitting, not Johnson.

Massie is being disingenuous when he says things have gotten worse when Johnson is just following the same BS that McCarty has done.

It irks me when Massie sticks up for that piece of **** RINO McCarthy and goes after Johnson while he's been there for just a small time.

If the Senate republicans ousts Mitch in a coup and gets replaced by a MAGA member are you going to let these RDS influencers convince you how much better things were under Mitch's leadership as well so you can show up thethe in your mind? Just wondering.
Click to expand...

McCarthy only served as Speaker for 260 something days. Apparently that was enough time for (R) to decide to remove him. And the calls to bounce him started much earlier than the 260 day mark.

Johnson’s been in the role 100 something days. I agree it’s “just a small time,” but for how many more days is that excuse valid?
 
Last edited:
acesfull86 said:
McCarthy only served as Speaker for 260 something days. Apparently that was enough time for (R) to decide to remove him. And the calls to bounce him started much earlier than the 260 day mark.

Johnson’s been in the role 100 something days. I agree it’s “just a small time,” but for how many more days is that escuse valid?
Click to expand...

True, but McCarthy was Minority Leader for a few years along with being a House Majority leader for several years. Mike Johnson is a noob.
 
sturg33 said:
Massie point is that the removal of McCarthy has only so far had negative consequences. He is not attacking Johnson. Massie correctly warned Gaetz that the GOP did not have the numbers to pull such a stunt and that is playing out right in front of us.

I want cochise Mitch sent to GITMO, but if MAGA forces him out and it results in more advancement of the left, then I would not support that

I'd like for MAGA to stack a win or two before they command I trust them. All I see is failure
Click to expand...

He says it's gotten worse when all I see is the same status quo occurring. Massie complaining about the House majority shrinking is rich when that's not on Johnson.
 
If the consensus of Johnson’s tenure is that he’s maintained the status quo, then what was the point of that circus to get oust McCarthy?

Does the end result ever matter to MAGA?
 
chop2chip said:
If the consensus of Johnson’s tenure is that he’s maintained the status quo, then what was the point of that circus to get oust McCarthy?

Does the end result ever matter to MAGA?
Click to expand...

Because we didn't think Johnson would maintain the status quo.
 
sturg33 said:
"You're fired!"

"Now get in line and keep voting for what we tell you to and keep raising us money!"
Click to expand...

I can't recall anybody having a bitch tantrum and quitting their seat before. If you could show me an example I would appreciate it. You're not entitled to the job and he lost with a democratic vote. He was warned ahead of time what would happen if he went RINO.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
Because we didn't think Johnson would maintain the status quo.
Click to expand...

The primary criticism of Gaetz antics at the time were that it didn’t seem like there was any strategy behind it. This status quo is a reflection of that lack of strategy.
 
chop2chip said:
The primary criticism of Gaetz antics at the time were that it didn’t seem like there was any strategy behind it. This status quo is a reflection of that lack of strategy.
Click to expand...

The strategy has actually always been do whatever it is the voters don't want (on the Republican side). I think for once the voters were satisfied with this 'strategy'.
 
sturg33 said:
Oh I'm absolutely fine with taking out McCarthy... I was very opposed to the establishment dude when Trump was whipping votes for him. Was sad to see Trump endorse the establishment once again

So I got no issues there. My issue is the apparent lack of strategy here. Who do we get instead? I'd say it's much more likely to get worse than better... This seems like a publicity stunt more than an actual strategy of effective policy change. Hope I'm wrong. We will see
Click to expand...

From 4 months ago
 
Jon Cooper
@joncoopertweets
·
10h


Johnson: “You have one job, Marge. One job. You got that?”

MTG: “Yes, Mr. Speaker. You can trust me.”

MJ: “Seriously, Marge. This isn’t hard. Just count the votes.”

MTG: “Relax, Mike. I’ve got this.”

Two hours later: First impeachment vote to fail on House floor in 160 years.


GFvLKJ6XsAEQ4BB
 
thethe said:
The strategy has actually always been do whatever it is the voters don't want (on the Republican side). I think for once the voters were satisfied with this 'strategy'.
Click to expand...

Could you describe your methodology for determining what voters want and what makes them satisfied. In a way that is not self-referential if possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top