2024 Field
- Thread starter Jaw
- Start date
sturg33
I
Come on man - Its a silly comment to say 'Single Handedly'
If we didn't have 50M+ illegals in the country our healthcare costs would be DRAMATICALLY reduced.
There are so many things that need to be adjusted first before you start taking things away from American citizens.
sturg33
I
I'm just looking at the budget and the expenditures.
There is a clear issue.
Add in the unfunded liabilities and it's a nightmare
chop2chip
Well-known member
As we become more obese and die earlier (which is the solution to social security I guess), those savings will be offset on the increased burden on Medicare.
I'm not saying its pretty - I'm saying there are solutions out there and changing assumptions where you can make this work. As a country we have to prioritize whats actually important to maintain a healthy/successful country. I personally think allowing people to age with dignity is one of them.
And when you take out all the illegals geting free healthcare we end up in the positive.
sturg33
I
So far your solution is that people need to die younger, while simultaneously arguing for a healthy/successful society
I don't know the math but we probably need people dying in the late 60s to even make this possible, and I doubt would do the trick bc there aren't enough workers to pay the boomers
[tw]1768274785727856952[/tw]
PA is only close because of that original Susquehana poll that included RDS voters that were understandbily heated after RDS dropped out.
Its looking more nad more like an absolute landslide. The same one that actually happened in 2020.
PA is only close because of that original Susquehana poll that included RDS voters that were understandbily heated after RDS dropped out.
Its looking more nad more like an absolute landslide. The same one that actually happened in 2020.
People are dying in their 40's/50's now. It sucks but I would like to incentivize better healthcare through coverage requirements that will simultaneously decrease health care costs but increase future SS liabilities.
CCP is a bigger threat overall - Zuckerberg was one of the driving forces to stealing the election which resulted in all the disasters we have seen since this illgitimate regime took over.
I can see a case to be made that Meta is almost as dangerous. Plus you can add in all the damage IG has done to our youth.
But you keep going Sturg since I identified what was happening from the first second and you just chalked it up to me supporting Trump. I'm sorry I had more vision than you on this. Just go seek help for you TDS and you would have seen it as well.
sturg33
I
I'm stunned you are evolving to agree with him. Down with meta! Tik tok is good, actually!
I'd like to see Trump highlight his concerns of the bill rather than his outright defense of leaving tik tok alone
sturg33
I
Why wait til after the election to take the election I dereference ccp app?
sturg33
I
Given his very recent cozy relationship with Jeff Yass, of course
Agree with him? Is that what you think happened. How long have I been railing on Zuckerberg? Don’t be mad you were wrong about this bill. “Identical” “where does it say X could be banned”. All wrong - which is the usual for you post TDS infection.
It’s all about canceling x before the election. A child could see that. I’m sorry you can’t.
sturg33
I
What was I wrong about?
I was surprised Trump has so aggressively come out in defense of leaving tiktok alone, undermining MAGA Mike Johnson and agreeing with RINO sellout Thomas Massie.
My preference is to side with free speech, but I know that makes you certain I am a CCP slave lover
sturg33
I
Here's the link to the Trump EO in 2020, in case interested
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.go...ecutive-order-addressing-threat-posed-tiktok/
As usual, it was an EO, not legislation, so would have been overturned day 1 from Biden. Like the rest of his legacy was
And as usual, he backed off when he faced pressure.
Fast forward to today, and his endorsed house is trying to legislate this done, and Trump (after a meeting with Jeff Yass) wants everyone to just leave tiktok alone.
No mention of government overreach. No mention of slippery slopes. No demands to fix the bill.
Just flat out "leave them alone"
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.go...ecutive-order-addressing-threat-posed-tiktok/
As usual, it was an EO, not legislation, so would have been overturned day 1 from Biden. Like the rest of his legacy was
And as usual, he backed off when he faced pressure.
Fast forward to today, and his endorsed house is trying to legislate this done, and Trump (after a meeting with Jeff Yass) wants everyone to just leave tiktok alone.
No mention of government overreach. No mention of slippery slopes. No demands to fix the bill.
Just flat out "leave them alone"