What
Tweet?
It was actually Facebook.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ny...bout-case-family-member-before-guilty-verdict
What
Tweet?
You mean to tell me that the J6 committee was a con?
Gasp!
Rds was your best shot at that, and trump has not shown he would
Trump showed that in his first term he was pummelled with an onslaught the likes of which we have never seen and had to win a re-election against all odds.
We have no clue what a second trump term looks like.
Didn't he recently tell Hannity he has no intentions of returning fire?
If you use the most TDS of takes on what he said but you're free to post his full clip on what he said.
I don't really feel like looking it up. And is my TDS different than 57's? Because I'd imagine we would have heard very different things
I think this is a good response to prevent yourself from looking like a TDS riddled fool again.
to be clear, both myself and the 57's of the world heard Trump say he doesn't intend to punish his enemies?
TDS is an illness that overrides common sense. It doesn't have a defined conclusion.
Like most mental illness the host views the world through their own demented lens.
It's interesting you say this because it is you who has demonstrated over and over and over again that we must imagine a reality that no evidence supports
Like "I want never polled"?
I was never polled. That was reality lol
I mean like "RDS pushed masks" and "Trump's debt doesn't get impacted by today's interest rates" & "more houses won't help the housing affordability crisis" and "tariffs are good for Americans" & "RDS got paid a **** ton of money to become a RINO" & "social security shortfall can be solved by more jobs"
I could go on
Yes - Definitely can't match the intriguing nature of the Van Der Plats endorsement or that the polls were going to magically flip after the primary.