IMO I don't think a court room that doesn't have a democrat judge/jury would get him for this. There's just too much legal precedent in Trump's favor.
In New York or DC Trump would have been convicted easily.
Trump Trials Watch I
- Thread starter 57Brave
- Start date
IMO I don't think a court room that doesn't have a democrat judge/jury would get him for this. There's just too much legal precedent in Trump's favor.
In New York or DC Trump would have been convicted easily.
"Justice"
sturg33
I
they are undeterred. nothing ever slows them down. there will be a new hoax coming any day now and we repeat the cycle
Thethe, will you stop? lol
I will not stop till the BL and I visit Mount Rushmore together to view the greatest president in our nations history - Donald J Trump
This is what history tells us - I'm wondering if things have chnaged. Not that they wouldn't believe the next one but that the globalist left realizes how culipable they are and starts to quiet down.
They know whats coming.
Taking down Morning Joe / Nicole Wallace / Reid twitter was a massive admission.
Tapate50
Well-known member
Been a complete curtain pull back
Maybe some of their faithful followers will learn from all of it
They won't learn - They still think its a 'both sides' issue.
So many are so far gone. Its time to focus ont he youth and fix education. Eventually idiot people that think 'Both sides' will become a lesser proporation of voting population and we will have a more unified country.
acesfull86
Well-known member
It is pretty wild. When (D) imagined what this summer would look like, this certainly wasn’t it.
If I ever see Trump at a poker table, I’m not sitting down. Dude pulls runner-runner inside straights like no one’s business.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
It's really just odd to see people celebrating this like it's a win. It was dismissed temporarily. He can just be indicted all over again and the case continues. That you think delaying the case until Trump can pardon himself is an exoneration is sad and pathetic. If you actually thought he was innocent you would want him to have beaten the case on the facts of the case.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Lol
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
My "feeling" is one of equanimity. I think the question raised by judge Cannon about the appointments clause and independent prosecutors is a valid one. Other judges have ruled the other way. Our legal system is there to sort out these issues. Eventually it will probably come before the Supreme Court.
I understand why various administrations have sought to make use of this appointment mechanism as a way of protecting themselves against the charge that a prosecution is political. But as we have seen in this case, it doesn't really provide that protection. One takeaway is to just go through the regular DoJ procedure for bringing a case rather than use the independent prosecutor mechanism, which as judge Cannon ruled might have some constitutional imperfections.
Last edited:
lolololololol
Theoretically it could be retaken because I think it was dismissed without prejudice. However, good luck with that. lolololol
The fault on this lies squarely at Garland's feet. Tell him to actually follow the law next time.
sturg33
I
The optics of Biden going after Trump after the assassination attempt would be dreadful. So he won't do it.
And him not doing it will be the admission that it was political
On top of that they would have to get another prosecutor. They have no time to do this before the election.
There is a chance that the 11th circuit could overrule Judge Cannon. However, it wouldn't hold up if the SCOTUS got involved.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
It was naive of Garland to think he could somehow "depoliticize" this case. I don't know what the ultimate ruling will be on the constitutionality of independent prosecutors. But the reality is the independent prosecutor mechanism doesn't really work as a way to take politics or at least the appearance of political motivation from these kinds of cases.