I can't comment on Snit's ranking among managers in baseball because I don't follow any other team.
But if I simply assumed other managers made very basic and obvious decisions, it does make me wonder if we have a bottom five manager in all of baseball. These are just such bad, bad moves. I mean back to back nights giving up big leads over obviously wrong decisions. I mean we have a 40 year old pitcher over 90 pitches, 3rd time through line-up, has grinded through this game and you have an outstanding lefty in the pen. In the year 2024 there should not be an individual that watches baseball and would believe Charlie was better in that situation than going to the pen. Even beyond the obvious ones, it's even the relatively minor ones like using Iggy yesterday up 4-0 and now against a division rival he is either unavailable tonight or going a 3rd night in a row. It's just such bad stuff that I actually don't understand how we tolerate it.
If AA believes in the chemistry and his leadership, then why not at least help course correct with some form of an offseason tutorial. In any profession, no one is short of getting continuous feedback. For a team that pulls up power point data on hitters swing angles, you can't tell me we can't cobble up basic data that helps highlight the failure rate of these types of decisions by Snit.
Baseball is a very hard game - you just can't afford to so blatantly hurt your chances. I'll even excuse things like line-up order, etc. where he is so often clueless but at least the impact of it is relatively modest. But how in 2024 are we having situations like tonight from a manager? It's actually shocking more than anything and tbh at this point I can't even blame Snit because if someone time and time again does the wrong thing, and a superior permits it, then at that point it's simply the leadership that is failing.