Trump vs Harris debate

Can the MAGA translator explain the strategy of posting "I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT"

?

Maybe it's to get people to stop talking about eating the dogs
 
Republican County Commissioner for Clark County (where Springfield is located):

GXiALVxXYAAOqwt
 
57Brave said:
Odd you bring that up

Ronald Reagan announced his candatcy for POTUS in Philadelphia, Miss. on Junereentb only weeks before introducing us to the proverbial "welfare queens in Cadilacs"

It was learned after he left the White House he was in fact, rather than urban legend, diagnosed with dementia while srving as Co.mander In Chief.
Click to expand...

Wait for it… As a Dem at the time.
 
GXfl7krbwAML8ZU


hard to believe this is for real

i believe he is repurposing a picture of her crying over a young boy's death from cancer
 
“If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that's what I'm going to do."

-------JD Vance
 
nsacpi said:
GXijNObXQAA04SM
Click to expand...

What I’ve found so fascinating about this debate is how much they’ve leaned into the worst possible defenses of Trump’s performance. It’s like they immediately decided “biased moderation” wasn’t enough cover for Trump’s meltdown that they needed to work overtime to prove cats are being eaten and Harris cheated by having a plan and preparation for the debate. Trump allowed the debate to not be about policy, which is the one good talking point I thought they all had.
 
mqt said:
What I’ve found so fascinating about this debate is how much they’ve leaned into the worst possible defenses of Trump’s performance. It’s like they immediately decided “biased moderation” wasn’t enough cover for Trump’s meltdown that they needed to work overtime to prove cats are being eaten and Harris cheated by having a plan and preparation for the debate. Trump allowed the debate to not be about policy, which is the one good talking point I thought they all had.
Click to expand...

The affidavit is out. If it true or not remains to be seen. The fact is that the dems did this in 2016 by giving Clinton the questions so quit acting like this would be a stretch for it happen.
 
Garmel said:
The affidavit is out. If it true or not remains to be seen. The fact is that the dems did this in 2016 by giving Clinton the questions so quit acting like this would be a stretch for it happen.
Click to expand...

What I’m saying is there was nothing in that debate that should have not been properly prepared for, especially because they both didn’t really answer the questions anyway. The debate wasn’t lost for Trump because Harris had good answers to questions. It was because she had a plan to get him to lose his composure and he did so in ways she couldn’t have even hoped for.

If this turns out not to be a conspiracy, it’s a pretty big deal. But it sounds like bull**** right now and it seems odd to focus on that.
 
Garmel said:
The affidavit is out. If it true or not remains to be seen. The fact is that the dems did this in 2016 by giving Clinton the questions so quit acting like this would be a stretch for it happen.
Click to expand...

And if no evidence ever emerges she was provided questions, will it have any impact on your thoughts on the debate?
 
mqt said:
If this turns out not to be a conspiracy, it’s a pretty big deal. But it sounds like bull**** right now and it seems odd to focus on that.
Click to expand...

In order for it something to be bull**** it has to be extremely unlikely. Knowing how ABC acted during the debate it's not out of the question.
 
mqt said:
What I’m saying is there was nothing in that debate that should have not been properly prepared for, especially because they both didn’t really answer the questions anyway. The debate wasn’t lost for Trump because Harris had good answers to questions. It was because she had a plan to get him to lose his composure and he did so in ways she couldn’t have even hoped for.

If this turns out not to be a conspiracy, it’s a pretty big deal. But it sounds like bull**** right now and it seems odd to focus on that.
Click to expand...

The questions aren't near as big of an issue as supposedly telling her she won't be fact checked while he would be
 
chop2chip said:
And if no evidence ever emerges she was provided questions, will it have any impact on your thoughts on the debate?
Click to expand...

ABC deliberately rigged the debate in favor of Harris regardless if they didn't provide any questions to her.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nsacpi said:
I suspect you knew the answer to your question, but now you have it.
Click to expand...

lol

If this had been done by Fox News moderators in favor of Trump against Harris you and the others would be whining like little girls so your opinion doesn't matter.

The fact that you people are trying to excuse what happened is telling.
 
The whistleblower is not that far fetched as a believable storyline based on what we saw that night as well as what hte left has done in the past.

Not sure why people are acting as if its out of left field.
 
thethe said:
The whistleblower is not that far fetched as a believable storyline based on what we saw that night as well as what hte left has done in the past.

Not sure why people are acting as if its out of left field.
Click to expand...

It's the damnedest thing I've ever seen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top