sturg33
I
So things that make people more poor results in babies dying?
Now I'm confused what you actually stand for....
Again I've no idea what you're arguing.
Are you arguing with me that government should not protect our rights as individuals?
So things that make people more poor results in babies dying?
Now I'm confused what you actually stand for....
Taking a quick look at a large credit card company, Capital One.
Their net interest margin last year was 6%. Their average interest they charged on credit loans was 19%.
The feds capping them to 10% would turn their company unprofitable.
And yall support that action?
Again I've no idea what you're arguing.
Are you arguing with me that government should not protect our rights as individuals?
Margins are impacting by losses - Reduction of interest rates would result in extention to less credit worth people.
Reduction in interest rates might encourage more credit worth people to float more on their cards.
Telling a private business what price they can/cannot charge their customers is BY DEFINITION a price control.
What are you arguing here?
I'm arguing that usury rates put people into poverty. Poverty results in more abortion. You are ardently against any babies being killed.
It sounds to me the practice of these high rates does impact individuals other than the person leveraging the debt.
Then capital one is very stupid not to voluntarily reduce the interest they charge from 19 to 10%
Student loans create more poverty. More poverty creates more abortion. Therefore, since I don't support canceling student loans, I support abortion!
Yeah... epic IQ we got here
But can I please get clarity from you. Do you disagree with me that the role of the government is to protect pur individual rights?
I support canceling student debt at the detriment to the universities.
Do you not?
I do - Your simplistic lower order thinking of how individuals are impacted by corporate deicsions is what I'm disagreeing with you on.
Taking a quick look at a large credit card company, Capital One.
Their net interest margin last year was 6%. Their average interest they charged on credit loans was 19%.
The feds capping them to 10% would turn their company unprofitable.
And yall support that action?
Sure. But not by force. My view is the adult took the loan, pay it back. I would love to see the government not guarantee student loans anymore
It was a government "solution" which I'm sure you would support (help all the poor people get educated) that created the mess.
Pretty nice parallel actually to what you're cheering for here. A government intervention to the private market to help the poor people. What could go wrong
You do disagree with me?
I'll admit 10% cap could be too low. I'm more concerned with the 25-35% that some companies charge. Trump has also said this is just temporary and more than likely just hot air by Trump to get votes.
Would you want Kamala Harris to determine if 10% is too high/low?
Interest rates are not the exact same thing as freezing prices. A company can still loan as much money as they want with no limit. Now, if they limited the amount you could borrow it would be the same.
Price controls on goods damages demand and supply.
Show me where credit card limits on interest in states and laws against predatory loans have damaged the economy.
I'll wait.