GDT #25, 2/29/'14: Braves (Wood) vs. Marlins (Fernandez)

I'm utterly surprised we played like we did against the Marlins tonight. I didn't see the game, but I heard that Doumit was awful in the field and Alex just didn't bring it at all. Anything else I could get from a loss like this? Well, and Fernandez is the man.
 
I'm utterly surprised we played like we did against the Marlins tonight. I didn't see the game, but I heard that Doumit was awful in the field and Alex just didn't bring it at all. Anything else I could get from a loss like this? Well, and Fernandez is the man.

We got our tails kicked by arguably the best pitcher in the game.

Games like this happen to all teams.

Move on.
 
Worst game of the year. Ridiculous managing.

/eye roll

Something tells me at 9-0 the players have something to do with it. I thought it was creative; worth a shot. Pretty sure Alex Wood gave up 7 and Fernandez was ice.

Maybe the next time we face Fernandez you should manage the club, Dalyn. How do you think you'll do?
 
/eye roll

Something tells me at 9-0 the players have something to do with it. I thought it was creative; worth a shot. Pretty sure Alex Wood gave up 7 and Fernandez was ice.

Maybe the next time we face Fernandez you should manage the club, Dalyn. How do you think you'll do?

Confidence is a huge part of the game. How do you think Wood felt (after two straight 1-0 games) when he saw the lineup? It isn't a coincidence he had such a bad start.
 
Yeah, I'm impressed with their pitching. Not enough offense yet to make a run, but they're on track.

You do know they have scored 28 more runs than we have this year right? The pitching that you are so impressed with has given up 35 more runs than the Braves have. So it is really the opposite of what you said for the fish. None of that is on Fernandez as he is a beast. He has given up earned runs in only 1 game this year. The Phillies roughed him up for 6 on April 11th. Since then he has given up 0 earned runs in 23 innings, 16 of those innings was against us.
 
Yeah, I'm impressed with their pitching. Not enough offense yet to make a run, but they're on track.

Their offense looks a bit better than I thought it would be. With the second wild card, I think they will be in contention. Wouldn't want to run into them in a five game series.
 
I'm utterly surprised we played like we did against the Marlins tonight. I didn't see the game, but I heard that Doumit was awful in the field and Alex just didn't bring it at all. Anything else I could get from a loss like this? Well, and Fernandez is the man.

I didn't see the game, but having watched Doumit up here in Minnesota last season, I can assure you that this is s given.
 
Fernandez is someone we're going to have to deal with all year. In order to get better against him, you need to get more at bats against him. Instead of giving the Uptons 48 at bats against him, we give Schafer and Doumit those at bats. It's just dumb.

By the way, Justin was in a groove. Now he's had two days off.
 
Fernandez is someone we're going to have to deal with all year. In order to get better against him, you need to get more at bats against him. Instead of giving the Uptons 48 at bats against him, we give Schafer and Doumit those at bats. It's just dumb.

By the way, Justin was in a groove. Now he's had two days off.

Care to quantify what it means for the team and Justin for him to:

1) Have four fewer AB's against Fernandez, and

2) Have 2 days off in a row rather than just 1

Just wondering how big an effect do you see those two factors having.
 
Care to quantify what it means for the team and Justin for him to:

1) Have four fewer AB's against Fernandez, and

2) Have 2 days off in a row rather than just 1

Just wondering how big an effect do you see those two factors having.

I obviously can't quantify anything. My point is a hitter is likely to have more success the more he sees a pitcher. Do you disagree?

I was laughing at Chip last night when he said "The toughest thing for a pitcher to do is to face a team in back to back starts. I would imagine facing this lineup is even tougher than that!" Then Joe says "It's like he's facing a different team."

Exactly. If there is truth to the "tougher to face a team 2 straight starts," then Fredi basically took that advantage away from us.

Also, if you're Justin, BJ, CJ, and Uggla, doesn't a part of you get a little pissed off that your manager think Tyler Pastornicky has a better shot at performing than you agianst one of the game's best?

With regards to your second question, I think this is common sense. If a hitter is in a groove and is seeing the ball well, the last thing he wants is a day off, let alone two.
 
I obviously can't quantify anything. My point is a hitter is likely to have more success the more he sees a pitcher. Do you disagree?

I was laughing at Chip last night when he said "The toughest thing for a pitcher to do is to face a team in back to back starts. I would imagine facing this lineup is even tougher than that!" Then Joe says "It's like he's facing a different team."

Exactly. If there is truth to the "tougher to face a team 2 straight starts," then Fredi basically took that advantage away from us.

Also, if you're Justin, BJ, CJ, and Uggla, doesn't a part of you get a little pissed off that your manager think Tyler Pastornicky has a better shot at performing than you agianst one of the game's best?

With regards to your second question, I think this is common sense. If a hitter is in a groove and is seeing the ball well, the last thing he wants is a day off, let alone two.

I agree that familiarity helps a hitter. But the effect is fairly small. And we don't even know when Justin will face him again. There is also a small positive effect to giving our bench guys a game. We are arguing about small effects.
 
The positive effect giving the bench a game against Jose Fernandez is that they can all go back to the bench with 0-fers
 
The positive effect giving the bench a game against Jose Fernandez is that they can all go back to the bench with 0-fers

Whatever the result, I would argue four at bats against a major league pitcher is the same in terms of helping a bench hitter get a little sharper. As I said we are arguing about some pretty small effects here. That's really the only point I have to make as to the future consequences of the lineup choices made last night.
 
I didn't see the game, but having watched Doumit up here in Minnesota last season, I can assure you that this is s given.

What is Doumit's virtue? He can't catch. He can't play the OF. He might be serviceable at 1B the 10 or so games Freddie might miss this season. The Braves are usually so adept at constructing their bench with an almost unexpected balance of defensive whizzes and potent bats, but Doumit stinks up the whole joint -- especially when you consider what they are paying him.
 
What is Doumit's virtue? He can't catch. He can't play the OF. He might be serviceable at 1B the 10 or so games Freddie might miss this season. The Braves are usually so adept at constructing their bench with an almost unexpected balance of defensive whizzes and potent bats, but Doumit stinks up the whole joint -- especially when you consider what they are paying him.

The rationale is he brings some power to our bench. Other considerations: he is a switch hitter, he can catch albeit badly, which allows use of Gattis as a pinch hitter when he is not in the lineup.

Terdoslavich provides all of the above except the catching part at lower cost. Plus he is more acceptable defensively in the outfield. But the Braves love having a couple vets on the bench. Doumit follows in the tradition of Hinske, Diaz, Reed Johnson, Ross, Laird.
 
Back
Top