An Interesting Example of DEI in Action

Another thing - women are distractions to a bunch of young testosterone fueled men. Military people talk about it all the time... they become sex objects and distract from the mission
 
Another thing - women are distractions to a bunch of young testosterone fueled men. Military people talk about it all the time... they become sex objects and distract from the mission

Met a retired Navy officer in the hospital when my father was unfortunately on his last legs.

The ship would take off for a trip and when they were back 10 women were pregnant.

Its again an issue of people liek MQT that think the laws of society since the dawn of time are no longer relevant.
 
Oh this is the hypothetical 'switching of parties' that we learened about in high school?

Yeah, the gradual change from the dems to reps in the South pretty much destroys that narrative. We didn't immediately switch.

In the 80s Texas still had a lot of democrats and many of them more conservative than current RINOs. The gradual change happened because the dems went nuts with social issues.

That gradual change is still happening but some of it is occurring in blue states due to democrat party getting crazier.
 
Yeah, the gradual change from the dems to reps in the South pretty much destroys that narrative. We didn't immediately switch.

In the 80s Texas still had a lot of democrats and many of them more conservative than current RINOs. The gradual change happened because the dems went nuts with social issues.

That gradual change is still happening but some of it is occurring in blue states due to democrat party getting crazier.

I'm talking more how we learned in highschool at some point in the late 1800's early 1900's the parties arbitrarily decided to switch whereby Republicans became Democrats and vice versa.
 
Vermont is very rural. Upstate NY is rural.

Extremely close to major urban areas as mqt told you. Also very white as well.

In Mississippi where do people go for a quadruple bypass? I guess a hospital in Jackson can do it but do you think the doctor quality there is the same as in NY?
 
I'm talking more how we learned in highschool at some point in the late 1800's early 1900's the parties arbitrarily decided to switch whereby Republicans became Democrats and vice versa.

I know. I'm just showing that gradual change happened. In the 80's it was still happening and wasn't one quick switch like the libs say happened.
 
Another thing - women are distractions to a bunch of young testosterone fueled men. Military people talk about it all the time... they become sex objects and distract from the mission

I knew you weren’t as aggressively anti-legal immigration as the true MAGA believers, but increasing the amount of refugee women escaping from war zones because a soldier fell in love with them or got them pregnant is a boldly pro-migration stance
 
I knew you weren’t as aggressively anti-legal immigration as the true MAGA believers, but increasing the amount of refugee women escaping from war zones because a soldier fell in love with them or got them pregnant is a boldly pro-migration stance

im really not following the point you're making here

I want less women in our military so that the men in our military are mission focused instead of pussy focused
 
I knew you weren’t as aggressively anti-legal immigration as the true MAGA believers, but increasing the amount of refugee women escaping from war zones because a soldier fell in love with them or got them pregnant is a boldly pro-migration stance

Its female soldiers
 
Yeah, the gradual change from the dems to reps in the South pretty much destroys that narrative. We didn't immediately switch.

In the 80s Texas still had a lot of democrats and many of them more conservative than current RINOs. The gradual change happened because the dems went nuts with social issues.

That gradual change is still happening but some of it is occurring in blue states due to democrat party getting crazier.

I’m far less interested in the individual party affiliations of people in these states, and far more interested in the clear ideological through-lines between the Democrats of yore and the Republicans of today and vice versa. Voters in 1980s Texas were certainly capable of understanding, at least generally, the difference between conservative and liberal economic and social policies, so even if the Democratic Party had some holdouts in conservative strongholds with clearly conservative-for-the-time politicians, it’s not a strong rebuttal to the obvious ideological shift on the specific topics typically being discussed in these conversations.
 
im really not following the point you're making here

I want less women in our military so that the men in our military are mission focused instead of pussy focused

And I’m saying men overseas will just proceed to sleep with more of the local women, hopefully consensually.
 
And I’m saying men overseas will just proceed to sleep with more of the local women, hopefully consensually.

That has always happened and didn't impact the performance on the fighting field.
 
Not sure whats hard to understand that when fighting breaks out that women and unqualified men (because they are lowering standards) become liabilities.

This isn't me saying it. These are special forces veterans who are explaining this narrative. BUt I'm sure you discount their experience as well.

But men aren’t being excluded from the military! This isn’t a choice between two men or 1 woman and 1 man, it’s the choice between 1 woman and 1 man or 1 man.
 
But men aren’t being excluded from the military! This isn’t a choice between two men or 1 woman and 1 man, it’s the choice between 1 woman and 1 man or 1 man.

Who is saying people are being excluded?

Total performance is impaired when women and unfit men are in the fighting force.

What you could say is that good men aren't joining because of the 'inclusion' obsession of the left.
 
That has always happened and didn't impact the performance on the fighting field.

What war have we lost on the battlefield since the military went woke, man? We’re not ineffective at bringing destruction, we’re just fighting wars that are losing on ideological grounds. We didn’t fail to conquer Afghanistan, we just couldn’t effectively govern it.
 
Who is saying people are being excluded?

Total performance is impaired when women and unfit men are in the fighting force.

What you could say is that good men aren't joining because of the 'inclusion' obsession of the left.

So those “good men” are instead escaping the woke military by… attending Marxist Universities and Woke Corporate America? Or living at home gaming and leeching off their parents? Maybe the problem is that the people you *want* to join have better options than dying in some desert in Iraq, and the people you already don’t want in the military also don’t want to die in some desert in Iraq.
 
So those “good men” are instead escaping the woke military by… attending Marxist Universities and Woke Corporate America? Or living at home gaming and leeching off their parents? Maybe the problem is that the people you *want* to join have better options than dying in some desert in Iraq, and the people you already don’t want in the military also don’t want to die in some desert in Iraq.

'Dying in the desert' is part of the problem why good men don't want to join.
 
'Dying in the desert' is part of the problem why good men don't want to join.

I assure you the amount of people in the past 20 years who thought “I would go fight in this useless ****ing war and hopefully not get PTSD or die, but I hear there are women on the battlefield now so I’m less safe” is not high enough to offset the number of willing soldiers you’d be losing. The type of strong, capable heroes you’re lamenting didn’t get left behind by the military, they just found better options and stopped joining.
 
Back
Top