Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

mqt said:
Not if the customer base is unlikely to grow with the additional capital investment. I’m not necessarily assuming that Twitter can’t grow from this point forward, but it’s certainly still a murky proposition. If advertising revenue indeed increases dramatically in 2025, it would materially change the situation, but that outcome requires some optimistic thinking on behalf of Twitter investors.
Click to expand...

The advertisers left becuse of one reason. It’s no wonder after the election previously departed advertisers made commitments to come back. Now x will generate the same revenues at 3x the profitability.
 
thethe said:
Hahah - food service. You work at your girlfriend’s dad’s diner. Stop it buddy. You have no clue what you’re talking about.
Click to expand...

What's sad is you haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about. WHich is always cute. Remind me how many businesses have you ran? No you're a pencil pusher who's job is gonna be replaced by AI in the next decade.
 
zitothebrave said:
What's sad is you haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about. WHich is always cute. Remind me how many businesses have you ran? No you're a pencil pusher who's job is gonna be replaced by AI in the next decade.
Click to expand...

Fortunately for me if that happens (it won’t) - I’ve already made enough money to last mine and my kids lifetimes.

But I’m sure a diner cook won’t be replaced by robots soon. Oh wait - that’s happening already.
 
zitothebrave said:
What's sad is you haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about. WHich is always cute. Remind me how many businesses have you ran? No you're a pencil pusher who's job is gonna be replaced by AI in the next decade.
Click to expand...

Careful there chef they already got robots taking orders at McDonalds and delivering food
 
Again - why did advertisers announce they were coming back after the election? Did something change on the platform? Or was the reduction in revenue always artificial and now it’s going to come back at 3x the profitability?
 
Tapate50 said:
Careful there chef they already got robots taking orders at McDonalds and delivering food
Click to expand...

Knowledge/thought workers will be the last to be replaced by AI. Something basic like a diner cook has a 2-4 year runway. Actual chefs will survive for a while longer.
 
thethe said:
Fortunately for me if that happens (it won’t) - I’ve already made enough money to last mine and my kids lifetimes.

But I’m sure a diner cook won’t be replaced by robots soon. Oh wait - that’s happening already.
Click to expand...

Again you have no clue what you're talking about. Which is funny.
 
thethe said:
Knowledge/thought workers will be the last to be replaced by AI. Something basic like a diner cook has a 2-4 year runway. Actual chefs will survive for a while longer.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA

Algorithmic based learning is going to replace accountants in under 10 years. Bank on it.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2024/05/17/ai-taking-over-accounting-jobs/

First off you've got no clue how skillful a line cook at a diner is. You're not wrong, that robots/automation will replace where they're able to like McDonalds, Applebees, etc. where everything is basically already automated and most of what the human element is there for is QC.

But if you think Robots are going to replace my job you're funny.
 
zitothebrave said:
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA

Algorithmic based learning is going to replace accountants in under 10 years. Bank on it.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2024/05/17/ai-taking-over-accounting-jobs/

First off you've got no clue how skillful a line cook at a diner is. You're not wrong, that robots/automation will replace where they're able to like McDonalds, Applebees, etc. where everything is basically already automated and most of what the human element is there for is QC.

But if you think Robots are going to replace my job you're funny.
Click to expand...

Its cute you think I'm an accountant. Haven't been an 'accountant' in about 5 years.

Staff level accountants are most certainly screwed in the next 2-3 years. Just like paraleagals and any entry level position.

But you are not a chef so stop pretending that you are - Your 'skill' is easily programmable.
 
thethe said:
It ain’t hard to flip burgers buddy. But you tell us you understand business valuation.

Make sure you switch that supplier for napkins!!
Click to expand...

It isn't hard to let programs do all the work for you either.

BTW I know how businesses are valued. Let me ask you, if I have 2 businesses, 1 is gaining users at a higher rate and revenue, 2 is losing domestic users and revenue. Which one is value.
 
zitothebrave said:
It isn't hard to let programs do all the work for you either.

BTW I know how businesses are valued. Let me ask you, if I have 2 businesses, 1 is gaining users at a higher rate and revenue, 2 is losing domestic users and revenue. Which one is value.
Click to expand...

Was the first propped up by a corrupt regime and the second had a coerced boycott to stop advertising and then after the same regime was out of power started coming back?
 
thethe said:
Its cute you think I'm an accountant. Haven't been an 'accountant' in about 5 years.

Staff level accountants are most certainly screwed in the next 2-3 years. Just like paraleagals and any entry level position.

But you are not a chef so stop pretending that you are - Your 'skill' is easily programmable.
Click to expand...

Again, you haven't the faintest clue what you're talking about.
 
thethe said:
Was the first propped up by a corrupt regime and the second had a coerced boycott to stop advertising and then after the same regime was out of power started coming back?
Click to expand...

No the first was ran by a competant capitalist, the second was ran by a less competant capitalist who pissed off the core user base.
 
mqt said:
A person with the ear of the President owns the website and constantly talks about how users are influencing public policy through it?
Click to expand...

Ah so the reduction was organic but the increase was inorganic?

Got it
 
mqt said:
Nah, both were either organic or inorganic in the same manner. Advertisers are fickle and overly sensitive to brand integrity risks these days.
Click to expand...

'Brand integrity' was shot to **** during the woke era.

That era is over.

You guys are going to see it soon...maybe.
 
thethe said:
'Brand integrity' was shot to **** during the woke era.

That era is over.

You guys are going to see it soon...maybe.
Click to expand...

Nah, it just means something else right now based on current market conditions. You’re correct if the underlying assumption that *this* is the new baseline going forward is correct. If it’s not correct, advertisers will do something else and Twitter might not be a sound investment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top