Is Free Speech Under Attack in this Country?

mqt said:
[tw]1887885293866393619[/tw]

This right here is my problem with how Vance and Musk are portraying this situation with the DOGE idiot. It’s neither improper nor criminal to report someone running the federal government is a racist twat, even if you used to work for an agency that racist twat is opposed to. Suggesting it is criminal is not very free speech-absolutist.
Click to expand...

So she used to work for USAID.

Musk had contracts with USAID. How is this not a conflict of interest?
 
[tw]1889432243946528846[/tw]

I’m so glad that absolute free speech is back on the table. Gone are the days of being oppressed for not toeing the line on a new identity, right?
 
Tapate50 said:
Oh no!!!!

The AP can publish whatever it wants from what I skimmed through there

Access isn’t a right
Click to expand...

[tw]1889747347690889689[/tw]

I’d like to think American conservatives of all people would see this sort of statement and rightly acknowledge it’s ****ing stupid.
 
Trump admin is supposed to play nice with people that knowingly pushed lies like Russian collusion / impeachment / biden laptop?

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA - **** THEM ALL!
 
If the argument is "we're not gonna play nice on speech because they were bad on speech," that's fine, but you can't simultaneously pretend to also be the party of free speech. I know it's not fashionable to have PRINCIPLES, but the federal government compelling people to use certain words and not use other words is a bad thing, regardless of who is in power. So is suing 60 Minutes over its editing, BTW.
 
acesfull86 said:
If the argument is "we're not gonna play nice on speech because they were bad on speech," that's fine, but you can't simultaneously pretend to also be the party of free speech. I know it's not fashionable to have PRINCIPLES, but the federal government compelling people to use certain words and not use other words is a bad thing, regardless of who is in power. So is suing 60 Minutes over its editing, BTW.
Click to expand...

Restricting access to media outlets is not a restriction on free speech. Not sure why this is the argument here.

Just awful arguments when you know the entrenched media were effectively extensions of the globalist left.
 
thethe said:
Obvious collusion and coordination with entities that don’t want America to succeed. But they can still write whatever they want. You know free speech.
Click to expand...

What a weird way to describe you guys stupidly declaring that a body of water was renamed to excite your base and the AP not going along with it.
 
bafkreicm4bthh4bs6taytnesimv6l52m6atqkzszbeede3f4xm7tsyvcbi@jpeg


bafkreiak4efpav35insbulunntg4kadkywtezk7mnds4bozkkwu3x3k5de@jpeg
 
thethe said:
Trump admin is supposed to play nice with people that knowingly pushed lies like Russian collusion / impeachment / biden laptop?

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA - **** THEM ALL!
Click to expand...

why did Trump have Barr quash the Mueller Investigation ?
Pretty sure if it was a "hoax" Mueller a life long GOP would have found as much
and shut down a hopeless investigation himself,

One more question then I will leave you to your important work here,
What was it Trump was afraid of getting out ?

Might have been a hoax it might not, We won't ever really know

Ok thethe you can go back to your day job.
and I don't mean in " accounting"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top