MadduxFanII
Swallowed by Mark Bowman
I'll admit that I am so utterly uninterested in stories about deals the Braves almost made that, coincidentally, happen to disprove claims that the team was budget conscious in the offseason.
I'll admit that I am so utterly uninterested in stories about deals the Braves almost made that, coincidentally, happen to disprove claims that the team was budget conscious in the offseason.
Interesting nugget here from the AJC . . .
https://www.ajc.com/sports/atlanta-...-strider-and-more/UYESR37FUBB37KZAUC5HUMU654/
Stroman is a 5 at this point. There’s a reason no other team wants him.
Who had their second TJ? Sure wasnt Strider.
Strider had TJS during his collegiate career.
yeah, the whole "he didn't have TJS sthick" is so dumb.. He had a tear and they put a patch on the tear.. Does anyone know the data on how successful and the long term viability that brace is versus just getting the surgery? the chance of it failing or getting re-injured is the same and maybe more.. so Strider will forever be a huge injury risk after 2 elbow tears already.
yeah, the whole "he didn't have TJS sthick" is so dumb.. He had a tear and they put a patch on the tear.. Does anyone know the data on how successful and the long term viability that brace is versus just getting the surgery? the chance of it failing or getting re-injured is the same and maybe more.. so Strider will forever be a huge injury risk after 2 elbow tears already.
Strider had TJS during his collegiate career.
I feel like it’s basically semantics.
I feel like it’s basically semantics.
It is. He’s had his UCL repaired twice. If it wasn’t nearly as significant the recovery time wouldn’t be over a year.
Anyone claiming there isn’t real risk he won’t come back because “it’s not a TJS” is just sticking their head in the sand.
Who said there wasn’t any risk? Everything’s always absolutes with you. A simple google search can help you out:
“No, while both terms are often used in the context of elbow ligament injuries, "Tommy John" refers to a surgical procedure that completely reconstructs the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) using a tendon graft, while "internal brace" describes a newer technique that repairs the native UCL with added support from a collagen-coated tape, essentially acting like an internal brace to facilitate faster healing, making it a distinct procedure with a potentially shorter recovery time; so the difference is not just semantics, but rather the surgical approach used to address the UCL injury.”
Correcting people saying it’s not actually TJS because it’s a different procedure where the objective is essentially the same thing is a means to insinuate that the risk isn’t the same as it would be with regular TJS. At this point, it’s unclear whether this surgery provides a better prognosis than a 2nd TJS. Ergo, anyone doing this is essentially arguing that there is no reason, or at least much less reason, for concern regarding Strider’s outlook.